Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Chris Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android Subject: Re: DOJ is correct that Apple iPhone is far less secure than Android when RCS messaging is involved Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 17:28:57 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 63 Message-ID: References: <757fef4d5b.DaveMeUK@BeagleBoard-xM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:28:57 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a54028a95f3a078ced6bc86e0ca75d3a"; logging-data="1909765"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/lunqu1P9P7Tz63HgQ4+2/PG/qzwEFQwk=" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Cancel-Lock: sha1:5zBHbErzPCplLa7jLmJlezC5tXE= sha1:iKRa2iBO+MoyCBC6c8yjw3fsaVo= Bytes: 3419 Anonymous wrote: > Chris wrote: >> Anonymous wrote: >>> David Higton wrote: >>>> In message >>>> Chris wrote: >>>> >>>>> Oh and the election wasn't stolen. >>>> >>>> The reality, i.e. what was determined from the observable facts, was >>>> that >>> >>> ...they stopped counting in the middle of the night, >> >> As per their rules (in a few counties) laid down before the election began. >> People are allowed to sleep. > > Only to resume counting a relatively short time later? > > Furthermore, if you are counting mail-in votes (which should be > banned), you should be required to remain in that room until it's > DONE. No exceptions. Says who? It'll solve nothing. There's only one reason why you want to ban mail-in ballots. >>> threw out the >>> observers, >> >> Because they were trying to interfere with the count. > > No they weren't. > >> They were no longer observers. > > They were observers. > >>> and trucked in enough fraudulent ballots to swing the >>> election. >> >> Didn't happen. > > They had overwhelming motive and opportunity. Therefore, it is > reasonable to shift the burden of proof to those who claim the > election was clean. Already happened. All of Trump's cases claiming the above were either dismissed or found against him. 0/62 is an impressive failure rate. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits_related_to_the_2020_U.S._presidential_election You keep crying. >> In all cases of voter fraud two things were discovered 1) in no instance >> was there enough to come close to affect any vote, 2) most of the >> fraudulent ballots were in favour of GOP candidates. > > "Cases of voter fraud" as reported by the fake media, which simply > does not report cases of fraud in favor of Democrat candidates. lol. If you really believe this, living life must be difficult for you.