Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Making Lemonade (Floating-point format changes)
Date: Sun, 19 May 2024 15:14:31 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <v2dtk8$3itvc$6@dont-email.me>
References: <abe04jhkngt2uun1e7ict8vmf1fq8p7rnm@4ax.com>
 <memo.20240512203459.16164W@jgd.cix.co.uk> <v1rab7$2vt3u$1@dont-email.me>
 <20240513151647.0000403f@yahoo.com> <v1tre1$3leqn$1@dont-email.me>
 <9c79fb24a0cf92c5fac633a409712691@www.novabbs.org>
 <v1u6oi$3o53t$1@dont-email.me>
 <bcbda29c4c23543d1ed6de8290d1dc3b@www.novabbs.org>
 <v1ubel$3p1kt$1@dont-email.me>
 <01b78f15d6b5f87809163ce539356ef2@www.novabbs.org>
 <pZJ0O.14089$yT%1.12952@fx33.iad>
 <4551b3b18017eb57d94876733377f532@www.novabbs.org> <CPv1O.3$B7ge.2@fx34.iad>
 <06ca70b0f9a7f44c59dd827779ad855e@www.novabbs.org>
 <JbO1O.4264$ND9f.2639@fx39.iad> <v28ouo$2dptd$1@dont-email.me>
 <ad22O.8001$1%Qc.4507@fx18.iad> <v2bg2a$318im$1@dont-email.me>
 <mUc2O.11686$tPfe.3221@fx17.iad> <v2ds3r$3itvc$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2dsgr$3itvc$2@dont-email.me> <v2dt0m$3itvc$3@dont-email.me>
 <v2dt9m$3itvc$4@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 00:14:32 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c64270d287de33e0b6496e257486af9b";
	logging-data="3766252"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18gfiIIRaYk/lU2thLFMqJxsQJdpGCQabA="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rfRzfclHLhoSmdIBKo6Aha4C3ao=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v2dt9m$3itvc$4@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3336

On 5/19/2024 3:08 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 5/19/2024 3:04 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 5/19/2024 2:55 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> [...]
>>> I remember a little test that Microsoft made wrt 50,000 concurrent 
>>> OVERLAPPED ops in IOCP vs an event driven model actually creating a 
>>> windows event per connection multiplexing WFMO in several threads. 
>>> The event model did not perform as well, but it did not do too bad 
>>> either. I wonder if I can still find that paper. Back in 2002 or 
>>> something. Hard to remember right now.
>>
>> I am having trouble finding it. I do remember:
>>
>> https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/windows/it-pro/windows-2000-server/cc959494(v=technet.10)?redirectedfrom=MSDN
>>
> 
> I just found an old post from me back in 2003 with a link to the paper:
> ___________________
> You can get 50,000+ concurrent connections using IOCP, check out the
> following link:
> 
> http://www.microsoft.com/mspress/books/sampchap/5726a.asp?#128
> 
> You do have to do some memory management to get there, like posting zero
> byte receives to ensure that pending recvs don't lock their buffers, you 
> can
> also restrict the amount of pending sends the server has all together
> [...]
> ___________________

The way back machine found it, I think!

https://web.archive.org/web/20030216222720/https://www.microsoft.com/mspress/books/sampchap/5726a.asp#128

Nice!