Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alan Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android Subject: Re: DOJ is correct that Apple iPhone is far less secure than Android when RCS messaging is involved Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:02:30 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 136 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 00:02:31 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="558805e71fa3c9fc03b6dea5f4add060"; logging-data="3392439"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+nhfhwZ2upluzURW0S2iaEDjIl1ndN3FQ=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:c6PG+KiF/EU6wPRp2jRX1nech2Q= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-CA Bytes: 6532 On 2024-04-19 14:03, Anonymous wrote: > Alan wrote: >> On 2024-04-15 22:10, Anonymous wrote: >>> Alan wrote: >>>> On 2024-04-14 20:06, Anonymous wrote: >>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>>>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anonymous wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java Jive wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/04/2024 01:58, Hank Rogers wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So is trump. They are much alike and have never done >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything wrong. Ever. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Neither has ever committed a crime or screwed a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> customer or business partner. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is provably untrue, in that Trump has already lost >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> two civil cases, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wherein one of which a jury found him to be a rapist  - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in most civilised >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people's view, that is both committing a crime and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> screwing someone. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Losing a civil case is not the same as a criminal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conviction. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The claim was the he "never done anything wrong". Losing a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> civil case is a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> clear case of doing something wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> No it's not. Anyone can sue anyone for anything. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> And? If the court finds against you you've legally done >>>>>>>>>>>> something wrong. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Not morally. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Are you saying that Trump has never done anything morally >>>>>>>>>> wrong? You've >>>>>>>>>> completely lost any sense of reality. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> At the very least he cheated on two of his wives. He sexually >>>>>>>>>> assaulted one >>>>>>>>>> woman (probably more) and he defrauded several banks and the IRS. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If he legitimately "knife to the throat" raped women, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What the fuck does that mean? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> then why wasn't >>>>>>>>> he criminally prosecuted? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Like you said yourself the US system doesn't provide justice, >>>>>>>> especially >>>>>>>> against rich, powerful men. Sexual assault hasn't been treated >>>>>>>> well by the >>>>>>>> CJS for a long time. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well, you probably think Jacqueline Coakley was telling the >>>>>>> truth. LOL! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Forget accusations, most rape _convictions_ are false. >>>>>> >>>>>> Spoken like a true misogynist. >>>>> >>>>> Go read what happened to Harvey Weinstein. >>>> >>>> What exactly—in your humble opinion—"happened" to Harvey Weinstein? >>> >>> Why should some slut be allowed to go to the authorities after YEARS >>> AND YEARS and cry "rape"? >> >> Why should he be allowed to get away with it even if it's been years? >> >>> >>>>>> Are there any aspects of the law you trust? From here it sounds >>>>>> like you'd >>>>>> prefer the wild west. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> There are countless laws that literally invent crimes and >>>>>>>>>>> proscribe >>>>>>>>>>> punishments when there is no concrete harm being done to >>>>>>>>>>> anyone or >>>>>>>>>>> anything. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Countless, really? Examples. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Notable you didn't answer this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> All laws that punish mere possession of firearms by peaceable >>>>>>> men, for one, >>>>>>> if you really want to get into that debate. >>>>>> >>>>>> Why do "peaceable men" need to have a gun? In modern society >>>>>> there's no >>>>>> need for anyone to be carrying guns. It's just boys pretending to >>>>>> be men. >>>>> >>>>> Because bad and evil men exist. This isn't changed by modern society. >>>>> >>>>>> When everyone is carrying a gun >>>>> >>>>> But not everyone carries a gun. >>>> >>>> The simple fact is: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Deal with it. >>>> >>> >>> Do you think that someone is more dead after having been shot with a >>> gun? >>> >>> And why the focus on the "developed world"? >> >> Because those countries are similar to the US in terms of wealth, >> social development, etc. >> >> >>> Mexico has fierce gun laws >>> and a much higher murder rate. >> And there is a lot more poverty in Mexico. >> > > Poverty doesn't cause crime. Poverty leads to desperation, and desperate people do what they need to do to survive.