Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?= Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: DOJ is correct that Apple iPhone is far less secure than Android when RCS messaging is involved Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 18:44:29 +0200 Organization: Camembert Normand au Lait Cru Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 18:44:30 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d7579698af86ef85e7ba6a7e0e46b84e"; logging-data="3260001"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18SfM7Exs7Ythwqp1LNpQW5IHLO38ECUUU=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:115.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/115.9.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:HOtrWPBiFxwD6r8cc3qmwqPakFw= Content-Language: de-CH In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2293 On 01.04.2024 02:55, Tamborino wrote: > This is the common misunderstanding with both RCS in general and Apple's > update in particular. RCS is not end-to-end encrypted. Arlen again.Troll. Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!newsfeed.bofh.team!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail From: Tamborino Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.system Subject: DOJ is correct that Apple iPhone is far less secure than Android when RCS messaging is involved Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 00:55:13 -0000 (UTC) Organization: To protect and to server Message-ID: Reply-To: Tamborino Injection-Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 00:55:13 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="1166756"; posting-host="Yio9ymC2jq+OMXw7E8c8Ww.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A"; X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3 -- "Ave Caesar! Morituri te salutant!"