Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: oldernow Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc Subject: If you believe in the potential of the AI ecosystem as it stands, you're at least as stupid as AI Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 18:41:58 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 26 Message-ID: Reply-To: xyz001@nym.hush.com Injection-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 18:41:58 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d77aadaed114ea35f63a56af60201856"; logging-data="1629496"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18dX4aGHXki6ZwfszhZkSMoJy8cq6K3td0=" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:lDRLgrNMBINuhbeRYIiu9rLEyoA= Bytes: 1965 AI must fail because its overall ecosystem promotes information incest. What began with input from genuinely intelligent beings describing their experiences as biological beings is processed in accord with "statistical large language analysis" algorithms, and ejaculated/vomited/shitted back into the same information pond, *necessarily* being less valuable that that acquired from the previous information gathering round for not being rooted in actual, biological living experience. Subsequent mining of information from that pond implies gathering "information" *increasingly* less based upon the experience of actually living. At this point one would normally write "rinse and repeat", except in this case the "rinse" is actually a dirtying. My statistical analysis has concluded that the chance of the ultimate result being other than information birth defects giving rise to even more information birth defects - again, from the perspective of actual, biological living beings - is precisely zero. -- oldernow xyz001 at nym.hush.com