Path: ...!s1-2.netnews.com!news-out.netnews.com!postmaster.netnews.com!us11.netnews.com!not-for-mail X-Trace: DXC=@6;5Hml02m>T[HoeIC=dQ?HWonT5<]0T=djI?Uho:Xe;lL51CP6LDL<95GMl]75=81SC9a19>SYc;7@ Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Do Microsoft?s Copilot+ PCs Require Linux? Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 08:35:24 -0400 Message-ID: References: User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit OS: Linux Mint 21.3 Cinnamon, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI Lines: 42 NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1 X-Trace: 1716986124 reader.netnews.com 2363134 127.0.0.1:39263 Bytes: 2764 Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >On Tue, 28 May 2024 20:19:56 -0400, Joel wrote: >> Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>>On Tue, 28 May 2024 09:04:39 -0400, Joel wrote: >>>> Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>>>>On Tue, 28 May 2024 01:55:04 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> No, because it's [WinXP] a good UI and some stuff still works..from >>>>>> what I heard. >>>>> >>>>> Really?? That Fisher-Price toy-style UI was a “good UI”? >>>> >>>> You could switch it to look mostly like Win2000. >>> >>> You’re admitting that an even older UI out of the 1990s was >>> nicer-looking than XP? >> >> 2000's UI was a bit enhanced over 9x, actually ... > >Really?? Now you’re resorting to comparing it with even older, DOS-based >Windows to try to make it look good? WinNT 4 was the same UI as 95, 98 was about the same, 2000 was somewhat new, as was Me like it, and XP without the glued on BS too. It's just a progression. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.