Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: DFS Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: "Much higher CPU Usage on Linux than on Windows" Doofus 2020 Edition Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 13:24:58 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 45 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 19:25:01 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8e02727969c90067cd0bc9c4329fe279"; logging-data="3946022"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18L/Ym0fplPpoLoZnGvmimd" User-Agent: Betterbird (Windows) Cancel-Lock: sha1:YrdOgogqQvK809VMdJzxYmQYz6g= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2228 On 4/14/2024 9:33 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > Tyrone wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On Apr 13, 2024 at 7:32:39 PM EDT, "DFS" wrote: >> >>> I got similar results when Linux consumed 21% of the CPU just moving a >>> Thunderbird window around, but Windows used no more than 6% doing the >>> same thing. >>> >>> Linux: https://ibb.co/CJzXdBb >>> Windows: https://ibb.co/JBBkqWs >> >> Which is almost certainly due to better video card drivers on Windows. No one >> cares about video performance on Linux, since 99% of Linux usage is as >> DB/App/Web servers. Most of those are headless. No video card needed. > > What a reliable source is DFS! > > :-D I'm QUITE sure the results today will be similar. To test I'll have to install Linux in dual-boot. > Not to mention the test is from 2020. And everything is fixed now. > And how did he get that awful tearing? I got that awful tearing because FOSS crapware programmers are let loose with no adult supervision. > Was Doof running Linux in a VM? Going blind in your dotage?