Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: ? ? ?
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 09:18:11 +0100
Lines: 68
Message-ID: <l6i322F8mj0U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <1HWE6H1jV8YTvxfaaL7fnCCcpe8@jntp> <l3qubtFoko5U1@mid.individual.net> <OUBwWk7nMWGNJZmcRmw2PSfJVnw@jntp> <uraf1j$k54i$1@dont-email.me> <l3tl1lF7v86U1@mid.individual.net> <urcb9o$14049$1@dont-email.me> <H8rfjmuhUKt3d2dH4AwyunFLrCQ@jntp> <l4060uFjpt5U1@mid.individual.net> <L_G9QLYwTstxrFecTVopJTtYH98@jntp> <EwNCN.10443611$ee1.4526609@fx16.ams4> <l42p7pF1fdhU1@mid.individual.net> <1bcd63e24f9d1f35a1aa7af1b44091d2@www.novabbs.org> <l67dnaFikkfU1@mid.individual.net> <b6043cf438f884321bf1b6aed55f9871@www.novabbs.org> <nOzW9h5lv14P4evyrhp4vNNXtVk@jntp> <utudmq$3cgqk$2@paganini.bofh.team> <VZpVEhD6H2V4R5HxffS7-dcNhKc@jntp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net Fuli1u72+ok+RgY/X8F5aAshutVtHcWPbsgPKPJe1m6XeXdOmP
Cancel-Lock: sha1:DEKMffI/WAVUBLAV73w/YXrJhE8= sha256:y8FelTIR8z/Ck+mQPQufm9Vp++a5hYvCZRY/bW6HREQ=
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Bytes: 3805

On 2024-03-26 23:53:36 +0000, Arindam Banerjee said:

> Le 26/03/2024 à 23:05, Thean Nogushi Hatoyama a écrit :
>> Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>> 
>>>>> I personally think, that CMBR has nothing to do with the big-bang, but
>>>>> is caused by the gravitational field of the Earth.
>>> 
>>> How does that work?
>> 
>> first the earth emits faster than light tachions out in space,
> 
> How is that known?
> 
> 
> signaling a
>> complex process of CMBR radiation back to earth. I heard before this 
>> theory of "gravity", but looks fake, like Einstine.
> 
> It is not fake. It is not an attempt to fake, but an expression of pure 
> rubbish. Politely, unscientific.
> 
> 
> However my "𝙊𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚
>> 𝘿𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙜𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙈𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙧 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙈𝙤𝙫𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙆𝙤𝙚𝙧𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙨 
>> 𝙈𝙤𝙙𝙚𝙡" makes sense, since its about supper_positioning the 
>> amplitude of the involved mater probability distribution. So much 
>> indeed.
> 
> How is that scientific?
>> 
>> as for instance, the amplitude probability distribution of the bridge 
>> is minimal, compared to that of the Earth. Of course the bridge will 
>> collapse.
>> 
>> 
>> 𝗨𝗦_𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗱𝗴𝗲_𝗰𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗮𝗽𝘀𝗲𝘀_𝗮𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿_𝗯𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴_𝗵𝗶𝘁_𝗯𝘆_𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽_(𝗩𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗢) 
>> 
>> Authorities have warned of a ‘developing mass casualty event’ 
>> https://www.r%74.com/news/594914-bridge-collapse-baltimore-maryland/
>> 
>> Them Jews ate our lunch and them bridges just rusting.
>> 
>> Collapsing, aging infrastructure in a country preoccupied with spending 
>> billions of dollars on wars and apartheid genocide all over the world
>> 
>> Let's help Ukraine bomb the Crimea Bridge, but the US-Maryland Bridge 
>> collapsed instead. I'm laughing in French.
>> 
>> Sometimes karma is a beautiful thing.
> 
> Like it or not, it is there.
>> 
>> Right after Us allowed passing resolution in UN against Israel! Just wonder!
>> 
>> Zelebuttinsky was on board, frustrated at not being able to tear down 
>> the bridge in Crimea, he took out his anger on this cardboard bridge
>> 
>> Zelensky is taking notes

It's been a while since I read any of Arindam Banerjee's gibbering. 
Still a crackpot, I see. When is he going to patent his working 
perpetual motion machine?


-- 
athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots