Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [OT] The dumb and the guilty (Was Re: How many ....)
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 16:53:53 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 53
Message-ID: <v00rv0$3p34l$1@dont-email.me>
References: <199e94ddd32456be8b7d600a5058347b@dizum.com>
 <uvu2b7$32k7g$1@dont-email.me>
 <uvupro$m3g$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>
 <uvvfjk$3ff18$1@dont-email.me>
 <v00dpo$18bo$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>
 <v00pom$3okjc$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 18:53:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="57f626d5d5ce868fd51911f98e08cb7a";
	logging-data="3968149"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+iEfqtkB1LomwQbh4U2S5M"
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:LLK23oYnFM0a3AVzIxhfZU3mRU0=
	sha1:+UnQceX3ITV8uwXeYRclXT+tbKQ=
Bytes: 2705

solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
> The King-in-Yellowbeard wrote:
> 
>> In article <uvvfjk$3ff18$1@dont-email.me>,
>> solar penguin  <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The idiot insisted:
>>>> In article <uvu2b7$32k7g$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>> solar penguin  <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> The idiot inquired:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> In article <uvtv2p$31qr2$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> solar penguin  <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The idiot inquired:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Still arguing for the Pagans and not the Christians Birdie?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> No, I’m just stating the facts. That’s all.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If your religion can’t handle them, that’s your problem.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> What facts? The skewed facts?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> You base your research on tradition.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>>> 
>> 
>> SP - no discernment!
>> 
> 
> DY - no answers!
> 
> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
> 

Since in another thread, he uses the word “skewered” when he must mean
“well-reasoned” or “brilliant”, I can only assume that when he says
“skewed” he means “well-laid-out”.

He certainly doesn’t mean either word in any of their usual senses, since
he can’t explain what he means by them.

-- 
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor