Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: immibis Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic Subject: Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 20:54:52 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 8 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2024 20:54:52 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a1837118cd62700985cbfcccff128def"; logging-data="3059836"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/LroPB/YizvXJqjYMjIyFW" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:Iidi5nupYYqD67sFMo1FWIRlqZM= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2254 On 1/06/24 18:22, olcott wrote: > HH correctly reports that because DD calls HH(DD,DD) in > recursive simulation that DD never halts. > > HHH(HH,DD,DD) would report that HH halts. What happens after HH halts?