Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 15:30:37 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [OT] Professor inflitrates pro-Palestinian encampment; union leader calls for consequences Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv References: <20240505172958.000034ab@example.com> <20240505204412.000020d9@example.com> <20240505232212.000020e2@example.com> Content-Language: en-US From: trotsky In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 42 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 20:30:39 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 2659 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17cf75030e317987$22476$310004$2d54864@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 3044 On 5/12/24 5:56 PM, moviePig wrote: > On 5/12/2024 6:14 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >> In article , moviePig >> wrote: >> >>> On 5/9/2024 2:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>> In article , FPP >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 5/7/24 3:39 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>> In article , FPP >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 5/6/24 3:24 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>> In article , >>>>>>>>      trotsky wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> You're lying. Show some proof. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nope. You've shown that you don't even bother to look at links I >>>>>>>> provide so you can just fuck right the hell off with that noise. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Try posting links to reputable sources, and maybe somebody will. >>>>>> >>>>>> For all definitions of 'reputable' equal to legacy media that support >>>>>> the Agenda, right, Effa? >>>>>> >>>>> Nope. Just sources that aren't right wing nutjobs. >>>> >>>> Which you believe is true of any source that isn't legacy media >>>> supportive of the Agenda. >>> >>> But you don't *sound* like you think you live in a fact-free world... >> >> I don't. I do, however, live in a world where the media only has a >> passing familiarity (at best) with fact-based reporting. > > Where do you get your facts? I might have gone with "Are you getting your facts out of Uranus again?"