Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jeroen Belleman Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 09:56:51 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 32 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 09:56:56 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9e9ba17a3904009a78ad70a384c04470"; logging-data="2361476"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19w7Citm7DgXAIuxQRj2KPQ" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:v7chK1W5/9Mz+VEyz3tZ9rWpTWo= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2243 On 4/12/24 08:15, Jasen Betts wrote: > On 2024-04-11, Cursitor Doom wrote: >> On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 06:38:30 -0000 (UTC), Jasen Betts >> wrote: >> >>> On 2024-04-10, Cursitor Doom wrote: >>>> Gentlemen, >>>> >>>> This is an exam question that trips up even some of the best students. >>>> See what you make of it! >>>> >>>> Q: Is this statement correct: 'The signal level at the modem input >>>> increased by 2dBmV going from +3dBmV to +5dBmV.' >>>> >>>> Your pal, CD. >>> >>> db is a logarythmic ratio. an increase from +3dBmV to +5dBmV is an increase by 2dB >>> (not 2dBmV) >>> >>> Adding 2dBmV to +3dBmV will not get you +5dBmV because it's a >>> logarythmic scale. >> >> The question does require a "correct/incorrect" answer. It's a binary >> choice. Your answer is....? > > My answer is still "db is a logarythmic ratio. an increase from +3dBmV to +5dBmV is > an increase by 2dB" > It's "logarithmic". Jeroen Belleman