Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: shawn Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: OT: Question for Anim Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 23:55:30 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3fa150600be4ec866dd2f7bee88bc26d"; logging-data="111318"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+oepDwUXszGbcITvon4xkH9SNpY7sECRo=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:2QRv9oi63AhxoIcFTszHbqgQbYI= Bytes: 2074 On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 20:00:11 -0700, Dimensional Traveler wrote: >Anim, as someone who has worked in the TV/Film industry I'd like your >serious opinion on something. Elsewhere I'm involved in a discussion >where we are wondering how Apple can get away with the prices it charges >and is there anything it actually does better than a high-end PC. >Someone suggested video and audio (music) work. My understanding is that what Apple excels at is marketing and getting their various products to work well together. So everything just goes smoothly when you buy a new Apple product while getting a new Android or other product to work well with Windows can take some finessing. Also as you brought up Apple has long been known to be good for video/photoshop and digital audio work. I think Windows has products that, again, are as good as Apple but they tend to be better integrated on the Apple platform. That said that Apple tax is too much for my blood. I can see it if you need the integration AND can write it off as a business expense. >So my question is what would you use now for video and/or FX work? And >why please?