Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!postmaster.netnews.com!us11.netnews.com!not-for-mail X-Trace: DXC=Q\6P=7Ca2o_^63IA X-Complaints-To: support@frugalusenet.com Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 11:53:29 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Optocoupler datasheets Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design References: <66574685$0$2363143$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> Content-Language: en-US From: bitrex In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 26 Message-ID: <66574f79$0$2363150$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1 X-Trace: 1716998009 reader.netnews.com 2363150 127.0.0.1:40805 Bytes: 2004 On 5/29/2024 11:34 AM, Don Y wrote: > On 5/29/2024 8:15 AM, bitrex wrote: >> Any suggestions for how to approach methodically/mathematically >> selecting drive current would be appreciated, thank you! ("Don't >> bother" a valid option) > > One thing you can try (depending on what's on the other side of the device > and whether or not you want linear operation) is to drive it with a pulsed, > higher current source and filter on the isolated side.  (assuming total > power > is what's driving your design) > Right, that's a good idea. Situations where they're just left on for DC most of the time and trying to get minimal forward current by optimizing a resistor value seem hopeless. Could wrap a DC feedback loop around it which would only make sense in the situations where you have a lot more power available on the secondary side for some reason, hard to think of a use case. Logic-output couplers seem somewhat better specified in the sense they explicit state the relatively high minimum forward currents or all bets are off.