Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Sharx335 Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis,rec.arts.tv,uk.comp.sys.mac,edm.general,sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: The Unprotected Class: How Anti-White Racism is Tearing America Apart Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 23:06:06 -0600 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 93 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 07:06:07 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="70cf8f08422ba71b7de7761dc397d882"; logging-data="2893546"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX197a4OJUoAgLD+f4B7cWrDzUEbWgOyyZtE=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:7S1d+3s+zIWPfSxVspDrzMyHWBE= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 6104 On 2024-05-24 2:29 p.m., NefeshBarYochai wrote: > https://www.amren.com/features/2024/05/the-respectable-right-discovers-anti-white-hostility/ > > Conclusion > > As Mr. Carl writes, white Americans today “suffer from downward > economic mobility, declining fertility, rising drug addiction and > depression, and narrowing opportunities, all piled onto a false > presumption of privilege.” Any vestigial advantages they may still > derive from belonging to America’s historical majority are “informal > and evanescent cultural legacies,” whereas “the discrimination they > experience is . . . increasingly legal and formal.” > > Obviously, if there were any real “white privilege,” non-whites would > be trying to “pass” for white (as they once did). Instead, we see a > flight from white. The reported American Indian population ballooned > from 0.4 percent in 1970 to nearly 3 percent in 2020, not due to any > explosion in fertility but to an increase in Elizabeth Warren-style > claims aimed at getting non-white privilege. > > Mr. Carl acknowledges that whites are not merely the victims of > anti-white hostility, but often its most enthusiastic perpetrators. He > combines a defense of whites as a group with harsh criticism of these > white progressives, writing that their “moral mania has made them, > without question, the most destructive group in American life. No real > solution to our racial problems is possible until they either reject > their current anti-white animus or are removed from their positions of > power and authority.” > > The endgame of the current system is “the expropriation of land, > property, and other wealth from whites” and the institution of “a > permanent regime of anti-white employment and legal discrimination.” > As of now, he writes, “appeals to expropriation are usually indirect,” > but over time they “will become more direct and in need of less > justification as the political power of white Americans continues to > decline.” > > Two developments make this clear. The first is the growing success of > the reparations movement: > > Black reparations will open the door to massive multi-trillion-dollar > payments to any group that can seize the holy grail of victimhood. We > aren’t going to win this fight by nibbling around the edges, by > compromising, or by saying that groups deserve reparations for this > but not for that. We must pull up root and branch the entire concept > of mass racial reparations. > > The alternative is likely to be “racial extortion on an unimaginable > scale,” possibly leading to “interethnic violence and a collapse of > American society.” > > The second recent development is a practice imported from Canada: land > acknowledgements. It is no common for institutions built by whites to > “acknowledge” that they are on land taken from this or that tribe. As > the author points out, the entire practice is intellectually > incoherent, since the particular group whose lands whites occupied > were seldom or never the first group to hold them. An honest land > acknowledgement might sound something like: “Our ancestors took this > land from the Chippewa, who had previously driven out the Sioux to > another place where they would go on to massacre the Pawnee,” etc., > etc. More importantly, such “acknowledgements” are “an intellectual > precursor to expropriation,” and deserve to be taken seriously as > such. > > Mr. Carl reports that some readers of early drafts of The Unprotected > Class were enthusiastic about his ideas but felt that “a non-white > ought to write such a book instead of him.” > > Somehow a white person advancing arguments that white people should be > treated fairly was seen as unseemly. It’s an understandable political > instinct for anyone who has been involved in American politics in > recent decades, but ultimately it’s an attitude we need to eliminate. > > It is whites’ failure to organize in defense of our own interests that > had made the anti-white regime possible. As Mr. Carl writes, > “non-whites have organized and made powerful demands, while whites > have focused on broad, gauzy appeals to . . . universal rights” that > have proven “almost completely ineffective.” It is time for us to make > strong demands. > > As noted, we have looked here at only a few of the twelve realms of > anti-white discrimination Mr. Carl discusses. The reader should get > the book itself for the full story. I am unaware of any mainstream > book on race published since American Renaissance was founded 34 years > ago that pulls so few punches. > > > The Unprotected Class: How Anti-White Racism is Tearing America > Apart, Regnery Publishing, 2024, 369+xviii pages, > Very interesting. Yet another reason to hold the feet of the self-styled progressives "to the fire".