Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!postmaster.netnews.com!us11.netnews.com!not-for-mail X-Trace: DXC=7@YBM;Vf60>T[HoeIC=dQ?HWonT5<]0T=djI?Uho:Xe;lL51CP6LDL<95GMl]75=814O@^?_m4jZ6Wim7Li1M05>bA42oJX=@0 X-Complaints-To: support@blocknews.net From: Joel Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Another GNU/Linux Video Extravaganza! Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 08:55:24 -0400 Message-ID: <3ntg5j5vncc4eo9eh2h0qn8v83o72rtuff@4ax.com> References: <6654a3f0$0$6449$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <9tr5O.2752$1tf.1358@fx38.iad> <4VE5O.25834$4v08.18901@fx09.iad> User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit OS: Linux Mint 21.3 Cinnamon, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI Lines: 40 NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1 X-Trace: 1717073724 reader.netnews.com 2363149 127.0.0.1:60875 Bytes: 3023 Andrzej Matuch wrote: >On 2024-05-30 7:20 a.m., RonB wrote: >> >> Zelensky is not trying to gain anything for Ukraine. He's licking the boots >> of his masters in Washington, DC and London. His whole goal is not to save >> Ukraine, but to "weaken Russia." He's even used those words. He doesn't give >> a damn about those he's sacrificing as cannon fodder. Since he's no longer >> legally the president (even by western Ukraine "standards"), since he didn't >> hold elections, the Russians don't have to worry about "ending" him. But I'm >> guessing they figure he's more useful to Russia "in office," since his >> greed, corruption and callous disregard for his own countrymen is probably >> more demoralizing than the Russian missiles. >> >> What a pathetic piece of groveling shit. > >He's only a "pathetic piece of groveling shit" if your eyes are open and >your brain is responsive to common sense and facts. Let's ask DFS and >Joel Crump what they think. He was elected in a landslide, and would be again as far as I know, they might be able to have an election if Russia weren't terrorizing them and killing them. Face it, you're just duped, and so is Ron. It's pathetic, but then a lot of the crap you guys say is. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.