Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Spiros Bousbouras Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp,comp.editors Subject: Re: Editor of choice Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 16:59:21 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <878qzs5bgk.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 18:59:22 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="97aa2f11fa2d0b84ebc38fb71da321c9"; logging-data="2442472"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX194f/g05jALwvjjLjWlBf3U" Cancel-Lock: sha1:FeVkAJ0/qN2D3ZUFvXHhCaMVga0= X-Server-Commands: nowebcancel X-Organisation: Weyland-Yutani In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2149 On Fri, 31 May 2024 11:43:52 -0000 (UTC) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) wrote: > In article , G wrote: > >In comp.editors Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > >> On Thu, 30 May 2024 13:05:38 -0700, HenHanna wrote: > >> > >>> Vim does fine with Python and Lisp (Scheme). > >> > >> The thing with Vim is, there are so many Vims, and Neovims, and Vis, and > >> Gvims, and what all to choose from. And they are all subtly different ... > >> and incompatible. > > > >I use Vim and I don't have any problem with the other that I don't use, just > >choose one and use it. Besides the core commands are the same, the others just > >add something but never change the base. > > Vim and GVIM are the same thing - just different looks. [...] > As usual, LDO's comments (quoted above) are nonsense. I second this. There is only 1 vim , 1 neovim , 1 vi .They are all examples of vi-like editors of which there are several.