Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!postmaster.netnews.com!us11.netnews.com!not-for-mail X-Trace: DXC=RE9g`f@M_\X44H7ZL^CcbUHWonT5<]0T]djI?Uho:Xe[lL51CP6LDL\95GMl]75=8Q;^@RAU\IDKY7@ Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: "The first Copilot+ PC has been tested ? and it destroys the MacBook" (was: "The first Copilot+ PC has been tested — and it destroys the MacBook") Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 12:17:14 -0400 Message-ID: References: User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit OS: Linux Mint 21.3 Cinnamon, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI Lines: 41 NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1 X-Trace: 1716567434 reader.netnews.com 2363133 127.0.0.1:53255 Bytes: 2461 Tyrone wrote: >> https://www.yahoo.com/tech/first-copilot-pc-tested-destroys-135658453.html > >Oh look. Yet ANOTHER invalid comparison. > >The MacBook Air they used for this very contrived test has an 8 core M3. The >actual low-end version. Of COURSE the Qualcomm X elite is faster, it has a 12 >core CPU. > >Why don't they test against a 12 core M3 MacBook Pro? Or a 14 core model? Or a >16 core model? > >Not to mention that the M3 is last year's chip from Apple. The M4 Macbooks >will be available soon. > >Apple has nothing to worry about, and Microsoft just appears to be very >desperate by publishing these meaningless stories. "The report was compiled by >Ryan Shrout, an ex-Intel employee who’s now a part of Signal65, and it was >commissioned by Microsoft." I will concede you likely know this better than I would have, nevertheless, it shows where this is heading. M$ is nothing if not open to change. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.