Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Memristor cross bar arrays for faster AI neural nets and math? Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 10:49:41 +0000 Organization: Poppy Records Lines: 30 Message-ID: <1qqm32r.1oh64rrklkkowN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> References: X-Trace: individual.net Ccur0Dei7KGKfiCLJDOS6AZJzecS2yfzfeWGVX2K5iGpdXNFs8 X-Orig-Path: liz Cancel-Lock: sha1:eWcZCnaOUg96vbaUG+stJ1BOUIw= sha256:PMahDgclAFn4inHd4bGcbhU2tjZHzqjY63rVxRS93Is= User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.4.6 Bytes: 1893 Jeroen Belleman wrote: > On 3/18/24 05:55, Jan Panteltje wrote: > > Source: > > University of Massachusetts Amherst > > Summary: > > A team of engineers has proven that their analog computing device, > > called a memristor, can complete complex, scientific computing tasks > > while bypassing the limitations of digital computing. > > https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/03/240314145325.htm > > > > bit like our neural nets... > > I have an issue with calling a memristor a 'computing device'. If > you accept that, then so are capacitors and inductors! I don't see the problem. Switches, relays, beads on a string can all be computing devices - and not all of them have 'memories'. Pots have been used as computing elements on the front panel of analogue computers for years, so what is the difference between them (set by hand) and a memristor (set electronically)? ....and yes, capacitors are definitely computing devices: Blumlein/Miller integrator. -- ~ Liz Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk