Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jos Boersema Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish Subject: How the criminals used women as a =?UTF-8?Q?weapon=C2=B9?= Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2024 09:26:34 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 336 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2024 11:26:35 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="dbc9dfae208ae465cb6a147085a021ed"; logging-data="3471896"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+rO4ejdKNryl5IhqMd0GSK" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:R9Nl11+VyShyiNXZ+gwtrO2aJx4= Bytes: 22324 title: scientist made rats eat an American diet link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=78-h5nCKMDA source: Forward with Andrew Yang Agreed. The mothers where propagandized that being a mother was lame. The usual criminal suspects funded the magazines they read and believed without question. Rather than working for your (hopefully) loving family, all the fun was to be had by working for greed obsessed company dictators and the anonymous greedy financiers who help them into the saddle. This they where of course not told, and did not seem to comprehend. The ruling class doubled the work force which are their servants, and broke the family, which is a win-win for them. The woman where then convinced by propaganda that it was lame that there where specific industries and jobs for men and for woman (separately), and this ignorance of economic effects which they where taught, lead them into direct competition with men, which is a competition they will loose every time a job requires strength and/or stamina, which (on the other hand) are jobs which are being replaced by machinery the most, so the effect isn't as bad as it could have been. Special woman jobs would protect women incomes. If only woman are allowed to do cleaning, and cleaning being as essential as it is, they can fetch an equal wage compared to other industries, without any need for other regulations. If only men build brick roads (which indeed, only men do, but okay it is an example), all the men compete with all the men. If woman where to enter that market (by regulations for example), they just cannot produce the same amount of road and that has to mean that they earn proportionally less per hour, even though they put in the same or even greater proportion of their maximum effort, but their bodies do not produce the same amount, and that is what a business has to deal with in the end, and what the payment represents. The woman hence get paid what they end up being worth to that production, and this would be like a lazy man worker, in such a muscle intense job as laying brick roads. Hence the woman have basically ruined their own lives, because they read womans magazines full of ignorance. The magazines played to their pride, played to some sense of righteousness, and in the worst cases all the men where being seen as oppressors of woman, when in fact it is a rather small amount of evil men who control more and more of the land and the wealth who are the evil ones who try to enslave everyone. Example: to bake bread (at least I found out), in an efficient way, you have to be around the dough for many hours, even if you do nothing with it. I imagine that making bread is a little bit like raising children: you may not have to look at them constantly (well...), but you need to be around them, you need to be there, you need to check up on them every now and again. The mother at the house is perfect for this. Sure, the father at the house can do that also, but it is natural for the heavy muscle jobs to be done by the man (in the field), and the woman gives milk to the babies and this way gets into the just as tiring and demanding jobs at the house. Then when the woman was at the house minding all the many things there, the baking of bread just slips in there naturally. A good method of bread making involves folding the dough, for example every hour, and then eventually to bake it when it looks ready (simplified). It is a small job, but if you leave the house for hours to work outside, it suddenly becomes difficult. Hence they started buying bread instead. There is an argument that home appliances made womens jobs easier and so they could work outside, but the same could be argued for mens jobs outside the house also becoming easier by technology. The benefit of the technology however, does only partially go to the population. The main benefit goes to the land owners (etc). If he doesn't need you because he has machines, you can go home and die for all he cares. You have no economic position to benefit from the machines, because you are a tool yourself. You failed to understand economics sufficiently, and set up your nation correctly with land for all, and now poverty and death will be the reward befitting your ignorance. The woman then had less and less time to make good food, and even if they had enough time in total, they may not be there to mind the little steps in the food making process anymore. The advertizers also found out how to manipulate womans minds², so that the woman would imagine to herself that she had put love into a bake, just because she added an egg to a pre-existing mix for a cake. The men who are not in the evil ruling class, let all this happen without much of any opposition. The men and woman who see through it are so few and far between, it makes no impact. Nothing can compete with the _one eyed monster with the thousand lying tongues,_ the Television, or the subservient attitude people have toward the rich and greedy, or those they feel have the power. It is interesting for example, how the woman did not get angry at their work in the family being degraded by feminist propagandists, as if this work was less somehow, or not important, and they also seemed to accept just fine that the men who where often working themselves to death in the factories to support their families with what little money the criminals would give them for it, where now being accused of being oppressors of woman, just because it was the norm for the man to set the signature on some contract, which should be a trivial issue in a good marriage. So we see how the ruling class has tried to create anger in the woman against their husbands, to then coax them into a life of slavery which they didn't realize was the real world outside. What we can perhaps loarn is how valuable the woman in the house is to the health of everyone, now that it is not entirely lost, but diminished greatly. If you read correctly the above, this isn't even an argument about how woman _should_ be home. It is an argument to place great value on a woman who is taking the jobs at home, and for those who work outside the home to have their own industries so that they can get the value for the work they deserve. Everything is like upside down. The feminist want equal pay so they claim, but it is exactly their ideas which ruin this equal pay, because they look down on specific jobs for woman. Is cleaning to be looked down upon ? Basically, the feminists seem to hate woman, destroying their industry, destroying their value at home, and pushing them toward a life of underpaid service to the rich and greedy and the criminals in the top. Result: a lot of sadness and disease everywhere. The criminals in the top love it though, so this will not stop soon. It is interesting to notice that in a good marriage as it used to be, the man works for the money, and then gives it to the wife to spend. The man and the woman exactly earn the same, because they are a unit. In cases where the man is at home and the woman works outside, it is the same. The income is to the unit of two people. There is no difference, there is no fight between them. Conclusion: stop reading anything which is funded by the rich and greedy, which is everything where you see company advertizers or other suspect financiers behind it. They serve their own interests, while pretending to care about you. P.S. Another big reason for the bad eating of today, is that this type of food was just not available. It wasn't produced. To the degree that it was produced, it was very expensive. They just didn't have the money for it. In that sense, these problems are not due to propaganda and politics, but simply because it became possible due to the rise in technology. The people _choose_ to eat unhealthy. I guess it is multiple factors coming together. 1. It became possible. 2. The propaganda systems became extremely refined in the last century. 3. Technology made house work much easier, freeing up a lot of time there. 4. People usually do not understand economics and therefore accept landlessness as normal (which is a great sickness of society), which meant work outside the house did not benefit from technology for most people. This meant woman could be pulled outside of the house and into the field work, mostly as lower productivity and hence lower paid lesser workers, because that is how a market has to work based on productivity. 5. A wicked ruling class, which existed due to the general immorality in the people, but who gained their power mainly thanks to the incorrect economics being deployed. 6. Lots of other things too. I think all these things are still developing. It has the potential to become much worse. For certain these developments will cause World War 3, which has already started. The family will be more and more destroyed, people will be more and more enslaved. It will continue until they start to resist and do better. The entire gay madness is also part of all this. It serves multiple angles. It is a fake victory given to the left (labor) organizations, to keep them docile. It damages the family, it damages social relations, friendships, between men and men, woman and woman, because there is this sudden risk of crazy behavior. It starts up a group of people who cannot have children and who will mess with the healthy family mode of living. Some will be creating alternatives which will likely be damaging to children. The criminal ruling class will keep pushing and pushing, until they reached their end goal, which is total and absolute control. They want the power to kill anyone and in any amount, and to inflict pain in any amount, so that they can force the people to do anything, even to the point of suicide. They want the same control over humanity, as humanity has over chickens. This is their unwavering goal. They will only give it up, once we have destroyed them entirely. Notes 1. Woman where the topic here, but the criminals also use men to enslave everyone, and possibly to a greater degree, through such methods as war, Tyranny and all kinds of propagandized delusions. This is not a claim that it was the woman who have done it. Nevertheless, there seems to be a specific method of control going on, from the top criminals, aimed and using woman as a whole as a political weapon against themselves and society at large. 2. Perhaps it can work to add after every advertizement, which is typically a feel good moment meant to create product association with happiness, an equally long truth advertizement about the same topic. You then don't damage the freedom of speech, but simply make use of that right yourself, as a society. For example you would first see an advertizement about how great it is to ride some kind of car, and then you see a movie about everything which can be destroyed by the same car. What is odd about people is that they are so 100% emotional about everything, and 0% rational, as is proven in advertizing. If you want to sell global nuclear war, all you have to do is put a few skimpily dressed young woman on The Bomb, or how a happy family is laughing and having a good time while the nukes are falling. It does not seem to register that these advertizements are fraud, like the ========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========