Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Don Y Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Raspberry Pi5 versus other cheap Intel based boxes for general computing Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 08:56:42 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 11 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 15:56:52 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c1dfacc0be1aec04af899ba22e67cdce"; logging-data="30119"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18VEjEpvTeo/uRtLP1NNbMl" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:izFf1ufCIZBtTMe6OY3MxtRvr0Y= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 1570 On 4/3/2024 8:38 AM, Jeroen Belleman wrote: > If an expensive one fails, it takes just a much. Having spares is an easy solution. I have 6 identical workstations and three spare power supplies for them (as they are an atypical design). So far, not even a disk failure (touch wood) -- which would be trivial to guard against (with another copy of the disk)!