Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moviePig Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Kamala Outright Lies About Women's Basketball Brackets Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 13:14:45 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 43 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 19:14:46 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="832afefa845fc849df05d8d27ae24b55"; logging-data="1874186"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18pMEriXgi+wJjl5jJ4lo35QP9uTo6JemY=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:NkAipinzZXYDyg620HzB+4J751Q= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2658 On 5/30/2024 12:05 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > In article , FPP > wrote: > >> On 5/29/24 4:19 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > >>> Kamala Harris claimed that women's basketball wasn't even allowed to have >>> playoff brackets until 2022, when in reality, women's basketball has been >>> using them since 1982, 42 years. >>> >>> Kamala herself tweeted out exchanges with her husband in 2021 where they >>> talked about who they were choosing in their brackets. >>> >>> https://youtu.be/yYjH5g9ogXE?t=409 >>> >>> Between Biden's almost weekly made-up stories about his past and Kamala >>> gaslighting us about women's basketball, what the hell is going on in the >>> White House? > >> Now tell the rest of the story, coward. But you won't, so I'll have to >> do it again. >> >>> Mediaite reached out to the Vice President's office for clarification and >>> was told that Harris did, in fact, misspeak and that she meant to say that >>> the use of the "March Madness" copyright was only made available to the >>> women's tournament lin 2022. > > Hahahahahahahahahaha! > > "Misspeak". That's politician code for "lie". > >> Feel better now, Bunky? She owned up to her mistake and explained it. >> Something you or any of your Oathkeeper buddies would have the stones >> to do. > > Just like you refuse to do in the UNRWA thread. No, it wasn't a lie ...even for a politician. She didn't deliberately conceal any facts.