Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Bill Sloman Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: CO2 Funny Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 14:30:24 +1000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 51 Message-ID: References: <044o4j5st4od6fca3lj3pgs9diccmrenjn@4ax.com> <2lep4j1lvsiathlf5mu1sov52fkppten50@4ax.com> <54np4j5eq0gga4u24i69i6sechie1ohcjd@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 06:30:33 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="19381622f0efd709a5eefd4199c567b1"; logging-data="1689463"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19kxUvRL1kH0+08qjLeBzXf81hFAyz9wtQ=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:3ZgWzuxPyH4ajrAbCW1R9nx7fwA= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 3160 On 23/05/2024 12:54 am, john larkin wrote: > On Wed, 22 May 2024 13:58:13 -0000 (UTC), jim whitby > wrote: > >> On Wed, 22 May 2024 14:36:00 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard wrote: >> >> >> >>> Who says I don't? Unlike you, an odious little narcissist, I don't feel >>> the need to show everyone here how clever I am. >> >> Spoken like a true liberal. >> >> When things don't go your way... start name calling. > > Exactly. Cheap insults are, well, cheap. > > SED should be, and arguably was, a place where one could post > architectures and circuits and essentially publicly brainstorm, get > ideas from other people. Designing in public [1]. I've learned a lot > that way. And SED needs things to discuss instead of Climate Change > and Palestine. [2] John Larkin doesn't design at all, and certainly not in public. He may have learned a lot, but he still has a lot to learn. S.E.D. could use more electronic discussion, but popular issues keep people posting and reading between the ocasional bits of itnerswtign electronics. John Larkin has posted recipes here. > SED, and I guess usenet, is slowly dying. The nasty noise has driven > away most of the people who are really interested in electronics. Says one of the nastier noise generators. > Can anyone recommend a better, more civil, moderated forum to discuss > electronic design? > > 1. [not the really good ones, obviously] > > 2. [opinions on such subjects are not testable. Circuits are.] Opinions on that subject are easily testable - post a link to the "better" forum and we can look at it for ourselves. What John Larkin seems to want is the fulsome flattery he isn't equipped to earn. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney