Path: Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:21:40 +0000 From: John Larkin Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: OT: More Nails in the Global Warming Scam's Coffin Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 20:21:39 -0700 Organization: highland technology Message-ID: References: <1qqw3sg.1xt0x6u1pf4tigN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <7thuvidj3d6df9uurcg5k02hvdf3q8im7n@4ax.com> <65ff5116$0$4189$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <65ff8ae1$0$2077928$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 70 X-Trace: sv3-KgmFUbcO6GD9gY4TD5TAur+c5MjISNfoSOQQ06yaUJ56bIf3lFCH8YvQff2zbDRy09VGHuxHps4RmZS!hxnK+go4lrjQPp+GtAoCJiijELKSlRGHjh95VduC2PsMDyW4yQKKZBXaLwxqIRr2o/c+YA9vuFV4!1/2XHQ== X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 4440 On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 22:07:28 -0400, bitrex wrote: >On 3/23/2024 7:53 PM, john larkin wrote: >> On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 18:00:53 -0400, bitrex wrote: >> >>> On 3/23/2024 5:23 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote: >>>> On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 20:43:15 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid >>>> (Liz Tuddenham) wrote: >>>> >>>>> john larkin wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 23:14:18 +0000, Cursitor Doom >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Awareness of the Climate Change scam continues to spread - at an >>>>>>> ever-increasing rate. As more and more people reject this preposterous >>>>>>> notion, only the most die-hard Marxists will stick with it - and be >>>>>>> shown up for what they are. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://tinyurl.com/e9wkbz8x >>>>>> >>>>>> Most people are bored with it already, and politicians are getting the >>>>>> message, and don't want to be blamed for unrelible, expensive >>>>>> electricity and for job losses. >>>>> >>>>> Unfortunately for many politicians, they have pubilcly proclaimed their >>>>> support for the scams and mirages of the 'activists' and even laid out >>>>> timetables for *when* they are going to achieve them, though not*how* >>>>> they are going to achieve them. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Electric car sales seem to have peaked. >>>>> >>>>> In the news bulletin on Radio Romania International a couple of nights >>>>> ago they proudly proclaimed that sales of electric cars in Romania had >>>>> reached 12,000 last year. A little leter the mentioned that the Ford >>>>> factory was turning out 1,000 engines per day. I assume they know the >>>>> difference between 'engines' (petrol or diesel) and electric motors, so >>>>> it looks as though electric car production is absolutely miniscule by >>>>> comparison. >>>> >>>> Long may it remain so. Almost all the early adopters of EV production >>>> were the well-in crowd who knew they were going to benefit hugely from >>>> all the subsidies they would enjoy at taxpayers' expense. Seeing them >>>> take a bath on their investment would warm the cockles of my heart no >>>> end. >>> >>> Meanwhile, cranky wingnut "I don't believe in dat climate change stuff!" >>> owners of beachfront property (naturally!) want the state/taxpayer to >>> pitch in to save their property from the rising sea: >> >> 2 mm per year! Panic! >> > >The sea seems to be coming in their front doors regardless, it seems >immune to right-wing talking points! Have they tried shouting at it? When you build a house on a beach in hurricane territory, it helps to have cheap federal flood insurance. Some really bad floods were the great Galveston storm of 1900 and the giant nor-easter in New England in 1938. Both in September. https://www.wunderground.com/hurricane/articles/deadliest-us-hurricanes I remember being in the eye of Betsy, and drove through Gulfport soon after Camille. Storms are less deadly now because we have satellite warnings.