Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 22:34:06 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Cating Agency Quits TULSA KING Over Stallone's Mocking of Extras Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv References: <1769890390.734556067.728640.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com> <17c55aa00fdc8490$38143$3340453$c0d58a68@news.newsdemon.com> <17c5e292e6e7ccaf$12785$4052113$2d54864@news.newsdemon.com> <17c5ee1015f93c01$751$2044614$4ad50060@news.newsdemon.com> <17c5efd2ed4e684b$56199$3349862$52d51861@news.newsdemon.com> <17c5f73d383498b3$1266$181469$48d50260@news.newsdemon.com> Content-Language: en-US From: moviePig In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 36 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 02:34:08 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 2337 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17c604db67ea34eb$13239$197378$4ed50460@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 2717 On 4/13/2024 6:50 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > In article <17c5f73d383498b3$1266$181469$48d50260@news.newsdemon.com>, > moviePig wrote: > >> On 4/13/2024 5:19 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>> In article >>> <17c5efd2ed4e684b$56199$3349862$52d51861@news.newsdemon.com>, >>> moviePig wrote: >>> >>>> On 4/13/2024 3:36 PM, trotsky wrote: >>>>> On 4/13/24 11:05 AM, moviePig wrote: >>>>>> On 4/13/2024 3:33 AM, trotsky wrote: >>> >>>>>>> Do you follow mpig's "logic" of "he gets a pass if he's only an >>>>>>> asshole in private." Here's a hint: why be an asshole in the first >>>>>>> place? >>>>>> >>>>>> I say lots of things in private that'd be "insensitive" if public. >>>>> >>>>> Cool, you and Stallone have something in common then. >>>> >>>> Speaking plainly when possible, for instance. >>> >>> Hahahahahahahahahaha! >>> >>> Irony meters across the world just exploded. >> >> Shouldn't that trope have left the nest by now? > > As long as you can continue to refer to Godwin with a straight face, all > bets are off. Umm, I don't remember when I last mentioned 'Godwin'. Even then, I'll bet it was an explicitly self-aware reference like yours right here.