Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: James Kuyper Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: A Famous Security Bug Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 03:26:11 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: <20240320114218.151@kylheku.com> <20240321211306.779b21d126e122556c34a346@gmail.moc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 07:26:12 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f103032d536191836a86a1ef17ad2258"; logging-data="3692364"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+BMiRh6PoVfVlBOwR328mWrGm6JNLClGA=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:TKl65HCb8NSFgQxxhO9xfHyZ+wY= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 1774 bart writes: > On 22/03/2024 17:14, James Kuyper wrote: [...] >> If you want to tell a system not only what a program must do, but >> also how it must do it, you need to use a lower-level language than >> C. > > Which one? That's up to you. The point is, C is NOT that language. > I don't think anyone seriously wants to switch to assembly for the > sort of tasks they want to use C for. Why not? Assembly provides the kind of control you're looking for; C does not. If that kind of control is important to you, you have to find a language which provides it. If not assembler or C, what would you use?