Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Cameo Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone Subject: Re: Ultra Wide Band? Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 19:01:22 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 19:01:18 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c2ebdbea31f33d848e6271286fbc6630"; logging-data="511392"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18cbiyQcWgP+5si4eYbDsXJihP2hrCiqKM=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:MD3PJx82TEsamy7o8i2OdiHitFM= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2183 On 4/24/2024 11:17 PM, Alan Browne wrote: > On 2024-04-24 07:43, Cameo wrote: >> On 4/23/2024 7:06 PM, Alan Browne wrote: >>> On 2024-04-23 12:52, Cameo wrote: > >>>> Then it’s on … Provided that the network provider has a near antenna to >>>> broadcast UWB. We need to see some indication of that so we can see the >>>> difference in data speed when it exists and when it does not. >>> >>> Do we? >>> >> I do. Because inquiring minds want to know. > > Conditions: > some network provider with broadcast UWB - which is not even a "thing" > as far as I can tell. > some indication that it's "doing something". > some comparative of data speed (you mean rate, but let's not quibble*) > from some non existent state v. a state that is not known to exist. > > "Inquiring minds want to know" is the motto of the National Enquirer. > > Hmm - not the best reference... > But it doesn't make itt less true.