Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: A Complex Metaphysical Conundrum
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 16:20:28 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <0svf1jlfc6c9628bmu16psve0lok99cb4b@4ax.com>
References: <c6hd1jdjimga6ifo7b0kv7bqfj9750lbk3@4ax.com> <uv6vav$16in8$1@dont-email.me> <ot1e1j91uq64os9624j71nnh6pu7odjcgv@4ax.com> <uv84nr$1irtl$1@dont-email.me> <jhnf1j98e4rlt0o2c05hs40vhmcasevh6c@4ax.com> <uv8rbq$1nod1$1@dont-email.me> <f7sf1j9plap51prhvu9vu1p7pvehvt93lj@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 17:20:29 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3ee569d00c4084ce2e4c35b0d486ea2c";
	logging-data="1852869"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/4F8sDtYwBPybjbpFTafSIXzaA4nw7Kcs="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4QbF+jJ7NmQfJzF8OC9BgZrNzb4=
Bytes: 2671

On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 08:15:07 -0700, John Larkin
<jjSNIPlarkin@highNONOlandtechnology.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 16:16:20 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
><jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
>
>>On 4/11/24 14:58, Cursitor Doom wrote:
>>> On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 09:50:14 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
>>> <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 4/10/24 23:42, Cursitor Doom wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 23:11:53 +0200, Jeroen Belleman
>>>>> <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/10/24 19:02, Cursitor Doom wrote:
>>>>>>> Gentlemen,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is an exam question that trips up even some of the best students.
>>>>>>> See what you make of it!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Q: Is this statement correct: 'The signal level at the modem input
>>>>>>> increased by 2dBmV going from +3dBmV to +5dBmV.'
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your pal, CD.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Haven't we had a discussion about this already some four years ago?
>>>>>> Weren't you Don Kuenz then?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jeroen Belleman
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't recall any such discussion and no, I'm not Don Kuenz either.
>>>>
>>>> Allright then. The statement is wrong. An increase is in dB, not
>>>> in dBmV.
>>>>
>>> 
>>> Nice, unequivocal answer there, Jeroen; many thanks.
>>
>>If you really want to open a can of worms, consider what might
>>happen when you *add* a 2dBmV and a 3dBmV signal together.
>
>The sum could be 1 dBmV.

If out of phase, or

If taught by the Nu Mathematics.