Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Bill Sloman Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: CO2 Funny Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 15:19:44 +1000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 82 Message-ID: References: <54np4j5eq0gga4u24i69i6sechie1ohcjd@4ax.com> <2k9s4j94256k6gbapd5snscqosn3b53ici@4ax.com> <4dju4jhjb5en96pfflaq64pqbjhv68cbut@4ax.com> <7dp05j1nullro5nq4uqsbtc6s162pd97pt@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 07:19:58 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c55357d15f021128543efd749c0208f6"; logging-data="2893641"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+U/ZdcAgiP8ZB8SFTArEm4ZIpS07E5/lQ=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:XvJe1thMLMWnB9/gEBVOvMduGTQ= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 4634 On 25/05/2024 12:17 am, john larkin wrote: > On Fri, 24 May 2024 11:29:37 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard > wrote: > >> On Thu, 23 May 2024 07:08:05 -0700, john larkin wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 23 May 2024 09:33:11 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 22 May 2024 10:52:40 -0700, john larkin wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 22 May 2024 18:10:58 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 22 May 2024 07:54:30 -0700, john larkin wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, 22 May 2024 13:58:13 -0000 (UTC), jim whitby >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 May 2024 14:36:00 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Who says I don't? Unlike you, an odious little narcissist, I don't feel >>>>>>>>> the need to show everyone here how clever I am. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Spoken like a true liberal. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> When things don't go your way... start name calling. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Exactly. Cheap insults are, well, cheap. >>>>>> >>>>>> Indeed. >>>>>> >>>>>> 9djf3jlovr2bmpkn03e18237njtcorg9rj@4ax.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> That was, in my opinion, a reasonable observation. Nasty humorless >>>>> people DO usually design nasty electronics. Or no electronics. >>>> >>>> Your hypocrisy is breathtaking! >>>> >>>> You started this off topic thread in which you posed a question >>>> completely unrelated to the subject. I answered your question >>>> honestly but your narcissism prompted you to take it as an insult >>>> presumably because I hadn't massaged your ego. You leapt in feet first >>>> with your stock insult and when I retaliated you and your fan club >>>> rounded on me for having the audacity to call out one of the worst >>>> offenders for insults. >>>> >>>> If you want to see SED cleaned up you should take a leaf out of your >>>> own book and stop indulging in off topic rubbish. >>> >>> Like active filters? >> >> Do try not to be so stupid. As you well know I was referring to the >> subject of the current thread being off-topic. >> >> Of course active filters are a suitable topic for discussion in SED, >> but when you include a stupid question in your own off topic thread >> you should not throw around insults when you get an answer you don't >> expect. Were you hoping for a "yes please" type of response? > > Obviously. But nobody is interested. Everybody knows that you won't actually post a circuit diagram or a .asc file, and most of us are aware that you won't have invented anything that it actually new to anyboyd but you. > Are you here to discuss electronics, or to cackle and insult? Lately > SED is full of clucking old hens who probably haven't owned an > oscilloscope in decades. The only oscilloscope I've got plugs into my computer, and I haven't used to for ages, but I still know what I'm talking about. You seem to own all sorts of sexy hardware, but you don't do anything interesting with it. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney