Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: vallor Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Nobara Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 01:18:40 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 49 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2024 03:18:41 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ffe10226b74ee01ac864cbfe0f93e51c"; logging-data="1241012"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/znw3UV+42tDN+xZCifXZa" User-Agent: Pan/0.159 (Vovchansk; ccc58f8; Linux-6.9.3) Cancel-Lock: sha1:wbvJwspLi5yfetC9Vl/DHjk3RnI= X-Face: \}2`P"_@pS86<'EM:'b.Ml}8IuMK"pV"?FReF$'c.S%u9 wrote in : > On 2024-06-05 1:25 p.m., vallor wrote: >> On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 16:05:07 -0000 (UTC), vallor >> wrote in : >> >>> Which Nobara spin to test? There are three: >>> >>> Original KDE special theme Vanilla Gnome Vanilla KDE >>> >>> ? >> >> Just tried the original spin -- Wayland keeps freezing up on me using >> the nouveau driver. (Never got the chance to get it on the NVIDIA >> binary blob.) >> >> Most importantly, the networking is stupid. I don't know if that's >> Fedora or Nobara, but it hangs looking for a DHCP address on my SAN >> connection. I configured my Synology Diskstation to give it an >> address, so I got past that, and to the point where I could set up the >> Internet connection semi-manually. >> >> Also, I did see the warning about "Nobara 39" being past end-of-life, >> which I assume is based on Fedora 39's timetable. >> >> What it *has* done is inspired me to look at modern Plasma as a >> desktop. I liked what I saw from the pinnable menus. >> >> TL;DR: wait for Nobara 40. > > I'll say this much: I'm glad that I'm not the only one who faced > troubles with it. It confirms that it might indeed be a problem with the > distribution itself and only itself. However, that leaves me with Fedora > alone since I would want to use the asusctl package which is developed > with Fedora in mind. I'm not convinced that Fedora will play nice with > some of my other hardware, regardless of how polished it seems to be. I installed asusctl on Mint for my tufbook -- there are instructions on the asus-linux web site. It's not a supported configuration though, and installing from source involves adding build systems, Rust, and a bunch of other buzzwords. I can't explain why they would make it so you have to basically be a developer to install it on non-Fedora systems. -- -v