Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mikko Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 12:44:54 +0300 Organization: - Lines: 33 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2024 11:44:54 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0e670f0fad830183dc51c091d8d9edbb"; logging-data="4043629"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19dIbE2oAJ7/go2iyJSsVju" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:mBUcMvcM6x/cETsGdW12MJdOpr4= Bytes: 3012 On 2024-06-02 14:08:49 +0000, olcott said: > On 6/2/2024 3:29 AM, Mikko wrote: >> On 2024-06-01 15:30:30 +0000, olcott said: >> >>> On 6/1/2024 6:22 AM, Richard Damon wrote: >>  ... >>> *I will not discuss any other points with you until after you either* >> >> That is a good idea! >> >>> (a) Acknowledge that DD correctly simulated by HH and ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ correctly >>>      simulated by embedded_H remain stuck in recursive simulation for >>>      1 to ∞ of correct simulation or >>> >>> (b) Correctly prove otherwise. >> > > Richard continually uses the CHANGE-THE-SUBJECT Straw-man deception > fake rebuttal to make sure there is NEVER ANY closure on any points. > He has been consistently doing this on every point for the last > three years. In such situations a valid option is to not respond at all. Another valid option is to respond to the part that is about the subject, or to note the lack of disagreement. And of course you may accept the change of the subject as it does not prevent you from continuing about the original subject in other messages. -- Mikko