Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: Getting there at last... References: <1HWE6H1jV8YTvxfaaL7fnCCcpe8@jntp> <9YCpfbWayDDTVrmI9Yye1LKiThs@jntp> <660C3EF7.3876@ix.netcom.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math JNTP-HashClient: lPnECOKwVaRDLhuOXlY0Cv9fb54 JNTP-ThreadID: 5ipMllmo3ZDdVjvYIsvl1ofrDVs JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=pV6diSgMn424_BVfaTlYcGfQbuQ@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net Date: Wed, 03 Apr 24 00:16:02 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/121.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/121.0.0.0 Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="601f4a4a60dc6043f0c3ab83656fd85fb6bc327d"; logging-data="2024-04-03T00:16:02Z/8803343"; posting-account="219@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Arindam Banerjee Bytes: 16035 Lines: 371 Le 03/04/2024 à 03:31, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit : > On 4/2/2024 10:23 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >> Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>> >>> Le 02/04/2024 à 16:51, Thomas Heger a écrit : >>>> Am 30.03.2024 um 11:38 schrieb Arindam Banerjee: >>>>> Le 30/03/2024 à 18:48, Thomas Heger a écrit : >>>>>> Am 28.03.2024 um 08:09 schrieb Arindam Banerjee: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Maybe you like my 'book' >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> TH >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From your book, the following quote >>>>>>> *** >>>>>>> This project was started as a search for the connection between QM and >>>>>>> GR. The connection was hypothesized and assumed to exist (without >>>>>>> knowing it's specific features), since nature has to be understood as an >>>>>>> undivided system. So all theories should describe the same world, but >>>>>>> possibly different aspects. Spacetime is a physical system, hence should >>>>>>> be build out of 'elements' (what are the 'building blocks'). *** >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Any connection between two theoretical (conjectural, impractical as yet) >>>>>>> notions as QM and GR must necessarily be theoretical as well. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sure. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you try to find a way between to spots (let's call them 'QM' and >>>>>> 'GR'), you need to assume, those spots do in fact exist. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's not the duty of the pathfinder, to prove the existence of the two >>>>>> endpoints of the way found. >>>>>> >>>>>> If there is actually nothing at these positions, it's actually not his >>>>>> fault. >>>>>> >>>>>>> In theory, the Moon is green cheese with cows jumping over it. >>>>>> >>>>>> No, not really. At least I've never heard of such a theory. >>>>>> >>>>>>> People were burnt to death for not believing that the stars moved in >>>>>>> crystal spheres, and the stars were holes in those spheres to let >>>>>>> heavenly light in. >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, that's not quite true, neither. >>>>>> >>>>>> Unfortunately, the catholic church had killed several scientists in >>>>>> the middle ages, but not because of their discoveries, but because >>>>>> they were questioning the authority of the church. >>>>>> >>>>>> That authority was meant to be absolute and ANY disobedience could be >>>>>> punished by death. >>>>>> >>>>>> This has changed significantly and today the pope does not intervene >>>>>> in physics anymore. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The justification for QM and GR as practical let alone scientific is not >>>>>>> there. >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, yes, because that was NOT my topic. >>>>>> >>>>>>> While there is charm in seeing the moon as green cheese with cows >>>>>>> jumping around it, and there is profit in all the heaven stuff, I see >>>>>>> neither pleasure nor profit from QM and GR, save for the careerists and >>>>>>> their dupes blown by math mumbo-jumbo. I know this is the most powerful >>>>>>> nonsense ever to be globally accepted, in our times, and that deserves >>>>>>> respect. >>>>>> >>>>>> You may rightfully critizise QM and GR, and in a way I would >>>>>> understand you, but this was not the subject of my 'book'. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Those really into physics better study my videos and texts relating to >>>>>>> physics. The US Navy, I find, has appropriated my new design rail gun >>>>>>> for their ships. The Chinese are using a version of that to launch their >>>>>>> warplanes from navy carriers. Facebook is so useful, to present new >>>>>>> discoveries and inventions, and see how they get stolen. >>>>>> >>>>>> You invented the railgun? ? ? ? >>>>> >>>>> Yes, I invented a new design railgun, where the bullet is heavy, >>>>> perpendicular to the rails, and the voltage is low. Overall, this design >>>>> is 10-100 more efficient than the earlier rail guns of the US as shown >>>>> in their pre 2015 videos. So it is practical and has been known since my >>>>> first paper on it in 2013. I showed that to my PhD supervisor in 2015, >>>>> and I suspect that it was transmitted to the relevant people from that >>>>> time. In 2017 I published the details of the invention in a series of >>>>> youtube videos. >>>>> My idea behind my PhD work (btw I am not a PhD as in the final viva they >>>>> said I had not made a working model of a rail gun, which was not what my >>>>> supervisor had been saying) was to show that the Lorentz force >>>>> accelerating the bullet had no ELECTRICAL reaction. (Since I have used >>>>> a rolling bullet/armature in my videos, there is apparently some >>>>> reaction but that is mechanical, due to the treadmill effect.) My >>>>> detailed analysis shows inertia violation. >>>> >>>> I had always thought, that my 'book' was 'revolutionary'. >>>> >>>> But your research is far more revolutionary than mine. >>> >>> The research period was from 1998 - 2015. It is development time now. >>> Thanks very much. >>>> >>>> So, hope the best for you, but see trouble ahead, because you are >>>> stepping on a lot of feet. >>> >>> Never a truer word was said. I am glad that at least one physicist in the >>> universe is not mocking or ignoring me. That is a start. >>>> >>>> It's interesting, anyhow. >>> >>> Well, it will take a lot of money to make a working prototype of an >>> internal force machine that will replace all rockets and jet engines. >>> How I can earn that money, is my present concern. Let us see if my next >>> project (making a very cheap "free energy" drive) works as my >>> maths/intuition says is should. I have found no patents for that, and that >>> is good. >>>> >>>> btw: I had 'published' my 'book' as google doc presentation, which >>>> worked quite well. >>> >>> My book "To the Stars" was published in Jan 2000 in my new "adda" website. >>> I presented my new formula e=0.5mVVN(N-k) to explain mass and energy >>> relationships on a kinetic and non-destructive basis. It got some >>> attention when in 2003 there was a global news release about this work >>> relating to updating Newtonian laws, with deliberate inertia violation >>> using Lorentz force, it that had no reaction. Had I been taken seriously >>> then, we would have been making daily trips to the Moon by now, and >>> gearing up for space mining, etc. >>> >>> Unfortunately for "modern physicists", as I right (from my inertia >>> violation experiments) they are all wrong. I don't expect them to like >>> being wrong, so resistance from their side is to be expected. I can only >>> appeal to their commitment to the scientific method, which has it that all >>> knowledge is provisional, and so subject to revision or expulsion. >>> >>> Look at the gains. Burning all the e=mcc=hv stuff and updating physics >>> will create plenty of jobs for physicists and engineers, for all time to >>> come! No end of learning and finding, with new machines always going for >>> new things. Why stick to the old and rotten, the senseless and the >>> constricting? May truth overcome the cunning of the globally established >>> liars. With my physics, the universe gets infinite like human potential. >>> Courage! >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Arindam Banerjee >>> >>> The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode >>> Arindam Banerjee, >>> HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne >>> 10 Nov 2023 >>> (All rights reserved) >>> >>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ >>> >>> *** >>> >>> Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0 >>> ========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========