Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Adam H. Kerman" Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Inconvenient lefties Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2024 23:34:04 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 31 Message-ID: References: <0B2dnfnk4IawGI37nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> <17c3b829d977a4bb$361$1351842$40d50a60@news.newsdemon.com> Injection-Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2024 23:34:04 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8b35f3a82528bad77260edde5fd5a277"; logging-data="2493489"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ePrzLji1TmoG822i+TYUDLy6VxmG87rM=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:BlZHx8QRgHaz/+A9joloErCPmug= X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Bytes: 2342 BTR1701 wrote: >In article <17c3b829d977a4bb$361$1351842$40d50a60@news.newsdemon.com>, > moviePig wrote: > >> On 4/5/2024 7:11 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >> > On Apr 5, 2024 at 3:57:07 PM PDT, "moviePig" wrote: >> > >> >> On 4/5/2024 4:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >> >>> moviePig wrote: > >> >>>> What *opinion* -- of anything anywhere -- can't be contradicted? Fyi, >> >>>> *that* would be a violation of 'free speech'... >> >>> >> >>> No one's muzzling or prohibiting you from making contradictory >> >>> statements regarding the SCOTUS ruling. However, your right to free >> >>> speech doesn't immunize you from being wrong or bar others from pointing >> >>> out your wrongness. >> >> >> >> ...where "wrongness" means "of differing opinion". >> > >> > You can have an opinion that SCOTUS decided wrongly and wish it had made a >> > different ruling but you can't have an opinion that the law is other than >> > it is. >> >> The 'law' is what SCOTUS has opinions about. I can have *my* opinion >> about either or both. Therein, the only "wrong" would be a misquoting. > >No, the law is what it is and it's not what you claim. You can have your >own opinions but you can't have your own facts. Aren't you quoting from the leftist legacy news media?