Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 20:36:20 +0000 From: BTR1701 Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: NBC Historian Takes Media's "Bloodbath" Insanity To A Whole New Level References: <17bed5b715bf3f58$7434$1098985$c8d58268@news.newsdemon.com> <17bf2142c28c7c76$917$1588242$4cd50660@news.newsdemon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Usenapp/0.92.2/l for MacOS Message-ID: Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 20:36:20 +0000 Lines: 55 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-IBw1QKxC6SgnN/eSGfXJPe+sHtXZ1A6bKojvo7v34LEhOFDv5pBr8FINFcFGDj4J1V9OattOZWhAAxl!mO63OqT3VPhMT0J3VCKcPyQ1hEM92egN2X1ijn3zXQlRYl3GLpWx05hTusL1dtifevKH1hvHNihR X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 3664 On Mar 22, 2024 at 8:55:51 AM PDT, "moviePig" wrote: > On 3/21/2024 1:14 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >> In article <17bed5b715bf3f58$7434$1098985$c8d58268@news.newsdemon.com>, >> moviePig wrote: >> >>> On 3/21/2024 11:04 AM, FPP wrote: >>>> On 3/20/24 10:42 PM, moviePig wrote: >>>>> On 3/20/2024 7:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>> On Mar 20, 2024 at 3:15:33 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>> Mar 19, 2024 at 8:26:17 PM PDT, super70s >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2024-03-20 02:46:53 +0000, BTR1701 said: >>>>>>>>>> What if the cops held the door open for them. Is that still >>>>>>>>>> unauthorized? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Lie: The rioters were invited into the Capitol by police >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There is clear video of the police holding the door open for people >>>>>>>> who were later found guilty of unauthorized entry. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How does that logically hold up? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> With that evidence, why wasn't the charge of unauthorized entry >>>>>>> withdrawn or dismissed? Seems to me that both the prosecution and judge >>>>>>> were obligated to do so. >>>>>> >>>>>> One would think. Obviously this only applies to a very small number >>>>>> of people who were there that day but for those to whom it did apply, >>>>>> it seems that as a matter of law one cannot be guilty of unauthorized >>>>>> entry if the people in charge of authorizing you let you in. >>>>> >>>>> Indeed. Not if one remains in the area he was let into. >>>> >>>> Jesus, pig... you don't believe that shit do you?  Judges and juries >>>> sure didn't. >>>> >>>> https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/04/politics/fact-check-capitol-insurrection-janu >>>> ary-6-lies/index.html >>> >>> I believe pretty much that whole article, including the admission that a >>> couple of police might've allowed a couple of rioters in. But what I >>> was addressing is the fact that allowing them into the building doesn't >>> equate to allowing them into Pelosi's office to shit on her desk. >> >> Which would be relevant if the people who were let in were actually the >> desk-sitters. > > So, the guilt-threshold requires matching a rioter's DNA to his feces? It requires matching the crime to the actual person who did it.