Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: FPP Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Mail-In Voting Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 12:43:00 -0400 Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn. Lines: 119 Message-ID: References: <68-cndeZBcdJV5n7nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com> Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 16:43:00 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="25ddeebed01c8cd9c05bbadd086500eb"; logging-data="1171493"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19mYJPoIUtuEKRd1v0laP1F" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:fS1Skigm0m+WG143YhS0AKLN67A= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 6410 On 3/30/24 4:58 AM, trotsky wrote: > On 3/29/24 4:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >> In article , >>   shawn wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 13:02:49 -0700, BTR1701 wrote: >>> >>>> In article , >>>> shawn wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 11:27:17 -0700, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In article , FPP >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 3/28/24 1:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>> In article , FPP >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 3/27/24 9:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No Latin American country permits mail-in voting. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are >>>>>>>>>> trying >>>>>>>>>> their damnedest to get instituted everywhere. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken >>>>>>>>> pottery, and put it in a big wine jar? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and >>>>>>>>> filling it out and putting it in the mail - and then track it >>>>>>>>> online so you can see it was received and accepted. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the >>>>>>>>> others are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in >>>>>>>> California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes. >>>>>>>> And not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to >>>>>>>> somehow be *losing* them. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> By math, stupid. The same way they go up. >>>>>> >>>>>> How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later >>>>>> reduce the >>>>>> total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did you >>>>>> count >>>>>> them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away and >>>>>> reduce the >>>>>> total? >>>>>> >>>>>> If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically >>>>>> checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples >>>>>> at the >>>>>> last check-in than there were at the first? >>>>> >>>>> Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone >>>>> counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were >>>>> later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no >>>>> way to know just what happened. >>>> >>>> It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We didn't >>>> see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with >>>> the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like >>>> trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence. >>> >>> Yet we keep running into this sort of thing: >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0xbgHmfjj4 >>> >>> Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES >>> >>> Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans >>> that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care >>> about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few >>> decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been >>> found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes. >> >> You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the >> southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a >> gigantic voter fraud scheme. > > > And you have no verifiable proof of this either, right?  Full on MAGA. > > >> >> The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the >> likes and size of which have no rival in human history. > Who needs proof? Thanny said it. -- "Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC Bible 25B.G. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0 Gracie, age 6. https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0