Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Ian J. Ball" <ijball@mac.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Cuomo Recants on Ivermectin
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 11:49:59 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <v3ahon$1q8se$1@dont-email.me>
References: <7fqcnaOYXPhO48r7nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <v3a3do$1nurk$2@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-D790D2.09021830052024@news.giganews.com>
 <v3abh6$1p68a$2@dont-email.me>
 <_hGdnR09YZZiWsX7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 20:49:59 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c16a10fa50967cf23c5ca96c10c0e34e";
	logging-data="1909646"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+xy6XhM696VvbXhF8Rybvq"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:7IAMWAXYeu00V3EO7eKFKDdQUqk=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <_hGdnR09YZZiWsX7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Bytes: 2488

On 5/30/24 11:39 AM, BTR1701 wrote:

> On May 30, 2024 at 10:03:33 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>> On 5/30/2024 12:02 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>   In article <v3a3do$1nurk$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>   wrote:
>>>>   On 5/29/24 3:15 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>   
>>>>>   Fired CNN anchor Chris Cuomo, who, along with the rest of the media,
>>>>>   mocked and derided anyone taking Ivermectin (remember how they called
>>>>>   it "horse paste"?) to treat the Wuhan Flu is singing a different tune
>>>>>   now.
>>>>>
>>>>>   https://youtu.be/yYjH5g9ogXE?t=902
>>>   
>>>>   Yeah. He's not on CNN any more, and can be as crazy as he wants.
>>>   
>>>   LOL! It's hilarious how the Left considers these guys the sages of our
>>>   modern age until they say something to counter the Agenda, then they're
>>>   immediately branded batshit crazy and dismissed.
>>>   
>>>>   He just indicated that RFK Jr. should be at the debate.
>>>   
>>>   He should be if he has a significant amount of support.
>>
>> The "significance" of RFK's support is that it could sink Biden, and not
>> even remotely that it could elect RFK.
> 
> "Bad for Biden" is not a reason to exclude a candidate from a debate.

"Bad for Biden" is a reason not to include Biden in the debate!