Path: Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 23:21:56 +0000 From: BTR1701 Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: [OT] Professor inflitrates pro-Palestinian encampment; union leader calls for consequences References: <20240505204412.000020d9@example.com> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X) Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 16:30:54 -0700 Message-ID: Lines: 93 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-mEsAul/H70dhltGxI2SaobsdpA9Vf11W3yAfui2qPfylYcGr7qMLpTXvAjUN/FqKBJwEIOgAM+ddfgJ!Cr7BFCAO7ETUV68ZLmqQlI6IAklPBN2XbtMmQEmJJ1YIfyxvHjz4uDLvHC+5LrH2kSYsACMHcSBf!84I= X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 5459 In article , moviePig wrote: > On 5/13/2024 6:33 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > > In article , > > moviePig wrote: > > > >> On 5/13/2024 4:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > >>> In article , > >>> moviePig wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 5/13/2024 1:47 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > >>>>> In article , > >>>>> moviePig wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On 5/12/2024 10:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > >>>>>>> In article , > >>>>>>> moviePig wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 5/12/2024 7:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On May 12, 2024 at 3:54:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On 5/12/2024 6:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> In article , > >>>>>>>>>>> moviePig wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/10/2024 1:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> And now the Scarf Lady, Dr. Deborah Birx, says that thousands > >>>>>>>>>>>>> of > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Americans could be injured from the mRNA Wuhan Flu shot and > >>>>>>>>>>>>> that > >>>>>>>>>>>>> some groups should not have been forced to get the jab. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Weird how she wasn't saying that when Biden's decree was "take > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>> shot or you're fired" in the federal government. Back then, she > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and your vaunted 'fact checkers' would only repeat the mantra > >>>>>>>>>>>>> that > >>>>>>>>>>>>> it's 'safe and effective'. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> You mean it *shouldn't* have been called safe and effective?... > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Ask the people who were injured from the jab whether they think > >>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>> government should have told them it was safe. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I'm asking what a responsible public health official ought to have > >>>>>>>>>> said. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> How about the truth? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> The truth is that every medical procedure *including NO procedure* > >>>>>>>> carries some risk. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> And an ethical medical professional explains the type and extent of > >>>>>>> that > >>>>>>> risk, as well as its frequency of occurrence in the population. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> They don't ignore the risk and just tell you "it's safe and > >>>>>>> effective". > >>>>>>> (And don't forget the denigration and censorship of anyone who > >>>>>>> suggested > >>>>>>> otherwise, who have yet again turned out to be right in the end.) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> People who know there's always a small risk don't need to be told. And > >>>>>> people who *don't* know it will grossly overreact when they *are* > >>>>>> told. > >>>>> > >>>>> So once again, it's okay for the government to lie to us for our own > >>>>> good. > >>>>> > >>>>>> So, the public at large heard "safe and effective", which, in context, > >>>>>> the vaccine very much was. Meanwhile, one needn't support censorship > >>>>>> to > >>>>>> strongly disapprove of sensationalist life-threatening disinformation. > >>>> > >>>> Once again, real-world decisions appear simplest to those who don't have > >>>> to make them. But happily, in this instance, the vaccine *was* safe. > >>> > >>> Except for the people who were injured by it. > >> > >> This just in: Don't risk getting out of bed tomorrow... > > > > This just in: People have a right to know all the risks of drugs they're > > not just being asked to take, but ordered to take under threat of loss > > of their livelihood. > > I'll bet that *all* the risks of *any* vaccine will run to thousands of > words The government has the bandwidth.