Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connectionsPath: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moviePig Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: [OT] Professor inflitrates pro-Palestinian encampment; union leader calls for consequences Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 22:52:42 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 98 Message-ID: References: <20240505204412.000020d9@example.com> Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 04:52:43 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1fc6a22e3e780876bb90be025b106293"; logging-data="4141336"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18/+ogQ8QG4B0bCjcrQAHf8Xe0fnHa58o0=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:sibpkFya8+6M5dE5DF/XJ+br+pM= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 5786 On 5/13/2024 7:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > In article , > moviePig wrote: > >> On 5/13/2024 6:33 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>> In article , >>> moviePig wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/13/2024 4:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>> In article , >>>>> moviePig wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 5/13/2024 1:47 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>> In article , >>>>>>> moviePig wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 5/12/2024 10:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>> In article , >>>>>>>>> moviePig wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 5/12/2024 7:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On May 12, 2024 at 3:54:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/12/2024 6:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article , >>>>>>>>>>>>> moviePig wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/10/2024 1:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And now the Scarf Lady, Dr. Deborah Birx, says that thousands >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Americans could be injured from the mRNA Wuhan Flu shot and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some groups should not have been forced to get the jab. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Weird how she wasn't saying that when Biden's decree was "take >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shot or you're fired" in the federal government. Back then, she >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and your vaunted 'fact checkers' would only repeat the mantra >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's 'safe and effective'. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You mean it *shouldn't* have been called safe and effective?... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ask the people who were injured from the jab whether they think >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> government should have told them it was safe. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm asking what a responsible public health official ought to have >>>>>>>>>>>> said. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> How about the truth? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The truth is that every medical procedure *including NO procedure* >>>>>>>>>> carries some risk. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And an ethical medical professional explains the type and extent of >>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>> risk, as well as its frequency of occurrence in the population. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> They don't ignore the risk and just tell you "it's safe and >>>>>>>>> effective". >>>>>>>>> (And don't forget the denigration and censorship of anyone who >>>>>>>>> suggested >>>>>>>>> otherwise, who have yet again turned out to be right in the end.) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> People who know there's always a small risk don't need to be told. And >>>>>>>> people who *don't* know it will grossly overreact when they *are* >>>>>>>> told. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So once again, it's okay for the government to lie to us for our own >>>>>>> good. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So, the public at large heard "safe and effective", which, in context, >>>>>>>> the vaccine very much was. Meanwhile, one needn't support censorship >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> strongly disapprove of sensationalist life-threatening disinformation. >>>>>> >>>>>> Once again, real-world decisions appear simplest to those who don't have >>>>>> to make them. But happily, in this instance, the vaccine *was* safe. >>>>> >>>>> Except for the people who were injured by it. >>>> >>>> This just in: Don't risk getting out of bed tomorrow... >>> >>> This just in: People have a right to know all the risks of drugs they're >>> not just being asked to take, but ordered to take under threat of loss >>> of their livelihood. >> >> I'll bet that *all* the risks of *any* vaccine will run to thousands of >> words > > The government has the bandwidth. But the issue is that the public doesn't.