Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: [OT] German politician successfully prosecuted for telling the truth
Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 05:53:17 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <v2rucd$2olbr$2@dont-email.me>
References: <20240522125702.0000756a@example.com> <v2qqqq$2fc26$2@dont-email.me> <N4WdnVHAzqcVuMz7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> <aau25jtung0h1hgmbs28egv5k7u2tj6u21@4ax.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 07:53:18 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e0d6adbdd672a9511db4d9a2fa43129a";
	logging-data="2905467"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+z8a0fOg0ivnJsg2tmk6PPd9mHIQSMTzg="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:FYMqlIb9cIcUmNxbZWIhEMA73sc=
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Bytes: 1901

The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
>On Fri, 24 May 2024 23:40:56 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

>>>>A large crowd in front of Trump Tower chanting "New York hates you!"

>>>If there's a law against expression of hate for an individual, sure?

>>So for you, all it takes is a legislature's say so and freedom of speech is
>>legitimately wiped off the map?

>There's a huge difference between inciting to hate an individual (who
>in some cases actually deserve it - like Harvey Weinstein) and a
>clearly defineable group.

Why does the motive make any difference? If there's no underlying crime
to consider or the words themselves aren't part of criminal conspiracy
to commit some other crime, then speech itself should never be
criminalized.

But Germany has never had free speech.

>Pro-HAMAS hatred towards Jews sure as heck isn't aimed at
>individuals...