Path: Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 22:24:41 +0000 From: BTR1701 Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: [OT] Professor inflitrates pro-Palestinian encampment; union leader calls for consequences References: <20240505204412.000020d9@example.com> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X) Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 15:33:38 -0700 Message-ID: Lines: 74 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-1Dg0sXAZA8u3OnMMmttmoFC0Asex3Lzvkb6bedjGh9gHqD9wCcS/KjWDEpwJDQiL8CgMjZjYCf4xTbG!8z6lyXywmKU0VADzTwxVebDgYmfzdKSnrduFpiEE8QhgVTsTe37DI03d7QDs3h98T2K8yX+KLxlg!MVc= X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 4809 In article , moviePig wrote: > On 5/13/2024 4:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > > In article , > > moviePig wrote: > > > >> On 5/13/2024 1:47 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > >>> In article , > >>> moviePig wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 5/12/2024 10:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > >>>>> In article , > >>>>> moviePig wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On 5/12/2024 7:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > >>>>>>> On May 12, 2024 at 3:54:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 5/12/2024 6:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > >>>>>>>>> In article , > >>>>>>>>> moviePig wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On 5/10/2024 1:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> And now the Scarf Lady, Dr. Deborah Birx, says that thousands of > >>>>>>>>>>> Americans could be injured from the mRNA Wuhan Flu shot and that > >>>>>>>>>>> some groups should not have been forced to get the jab. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Weird how she wasn't saying that when Biden's decree was "take the > >>>>>>>>>>> shot or you're fired" in the federal government. Back then, she > >>>>>>>>>>> and your vaunted 'fact checkers' would only repeat the mantra that > >>>>>>>>>>> it's 'safe and effective'. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> You mean it *shouldn't* have been called safe and effective?... > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Ask the people who were injured from the jab whether they think the > >>>>>>>>> government should have told them it was safe. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I'm asking what a responsible public health official ought to have > >>>>>>>> said. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> How about the truth? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The truth is that every medical procedure *including NO procedure* > >>>>>> carries some risk. > >>>>> > >>>>> And an ethical medical professional explains the type and extent of that > >>>>> risk, as well as its frequency of occurrence in the population. > >>>>> > >>>>> They don't ignore the risk and just tell you "it's safe and effective". > >>>>> (And don't forget the denigration and censorship of anyone who suggested > >>>>> otherwise, who have yet again turned out to be right in the end.) > >>>> > >>>> People who know there's always a small risk don't need to be told. And > >>>> people who *don't* know it will grossly overreact when they *are* told. > >>> > >>> So once again, it's okay for the government to lie to us for our own > >>> good. > >>> > >>>> So, the public at large heard "safe and effective", which, in context, > >>>> the vaccine very much was. Meanwhile, one needn't support censorship to > >>>> strongly disapprove of sensationalist life-threatening disinformation. > >> > >> Once again, real-world decisions appear simplest to those who don't have > >> to make them. But happily, in this instance, the vaccine *was* safe. > > > > Except for the people who were injured by it. > > This just in: Don't risk getting out of bed tomorrow... This just in: People have a right to know all the risks of drugs they're not just being asked to take, but ordered to take under threat of loss of their livelihood.