Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connectionsDate: Tue, 14 May 2024 03:12:40 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [OT] Professor inflitrates pro-Palestinian encampment; union leader calls for consequences Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv References: <20240505204412.000020d9@example.com> Content-Language: en-US From: trotsky In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 120 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.hasname.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 08:12:35 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 6145 X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17cf4cbc98e540f3$18990$3273241$c4d58e68@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 6547 On 5/14/24 12:50 AM, BTR1701 wrote: > In article , > moviePig wrote: > >> On 5/13/2024 7:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>> In article , >>> moviePig wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/13/2024 6:33 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>> In article , >>>>> moviePig wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 5/13/2024 4:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>> In article , >>>>>>> moviePig wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 5/13/2024 1:47 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>> In article , >>>>>>>>> moviePig wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 5/12/2024 10:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> In article , >>>>>>>>>>> moviePig wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/12/2024 7:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On May 12, 2024 at 3:54:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/12/2024 6:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article , >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moviePig wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/10/2024 1:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And now the Scarf Lady, Dr. Deborah Birx, says that thousands >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Americans could be injured from the mRNA Wuhan Flu shot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and that some groups should not have been forced to get >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the jab. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Weird how she wasn't saying that when Biden's decree was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "take the shot or you're fired" in the federal government. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Back then, she and your vaunted 'fact checkers' would only >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repeat the mantra that it's 'safe and effective'. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You mean it *shouldn't* have been called safe and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> effective?... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ask the people who were injured from the jab whether they think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the government should have told them it was safe. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm asking what a responsible public health official ought to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have said. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> How about the truth? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The truth is that every medical procedure *including NO >>>>>>>>>>>> procedure* carries some risk. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And an ethical medical professional explains the type and >>>>>>>>>>> extent of that risk, as well as its frequency of occurrence in >>>>>>>>>>> the population. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> They don't ignore the risk and just tell you "it's safe and >>>>>>>>>>> effective". (And don't forget the denigration and censorship of >>>>>>>>>>> anyone who suggested otherwise, who have yet again turned out >>>>>>>>>>> to be right in the end.) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> People who know there's always a small risk don't need to be told. >>>>>>>>>> And people who *don't* know it will grossly overreact when they >>>>>>>>>> *are* told. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So once again, it's okay for the government to lie to us for our own >>>>>>>>> good. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So, the public at large heard "safe and effective", which, in >>>>>>>>>> context, the vaccine very much was. Meanwhile, one needn't support >>>>>>>>>> censorship to strongly disapprove of sensationalist life-threatening >>>>>>>>>> disinformation. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Once again, real-world decisions appear simplest to those who don't >>>>>>>> have to make them. But happily, in this instance, the vaccine *was* >>>>>>>> safe. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Except for the people who were injured by it. >>>>>> >>>>>> This just in: Don't risk getting out of bed tomorrow... >>>>> >>>>> This just in: People have a right to know all the risks of drugs they're >>>>> not just being asked to take, but ordered to take under threat of loss >>>>> of their livelihood. >>>> >>>> I'll bet that *all* the risks of *any* vaccine will run to thousands of >>>> words >>> >>> The government has the bandwidth. >> >> But the issue is that the public doesn't. > > Ah, yet more infantalization and condescension from the government. Right out if the Oath Keepers' handbook no doubt. Well anonyshitted and white supremacisted. > And, of course, not only does the government lie to us for own good, it > has to also make sure that we don't tell each other the truth, so it > labels truthful statements 'disinformation' and coerces online platforms > to censor it. > > Can't have citizens undermining carefully crafted government lies (for > our own good!), can we? Not if this includes insurrections and generally fucked up and shitty behavior, no. Hope this helps.