Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jeroen Belleman Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: dBs Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 21:48:21 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 31 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 21:46:20 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4467f46698862013de31553bbb43058c"; logging-data="3729438"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/7uQNato+uiKUngZAIIQp0" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:f+Z2dhjUu0hNC5yEIRAPRk8Cn70= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2287 On 5/26/24 19:58, Cursitor Doom wrote: > On Sun, 26 May 2024 19:25:41 +0200, Jeroen Belleman wrote: > >> On 5/26/24 19:09, Cursitor Doom wrote: >>> I'm feeling cognitively-declined today, probably as a consequence of my >>> vast age and general ignorance of matters mathematical and everything >>> else in fact, with the sole exception of "fatuous conspiracy theories." >>> Can some kind soul assist? >>> If my RF power meter is reading -13dbm when there's a 20dB attenuator >>> in line, what is the true power level, please? >>> I've got an exhaustive App Note from Rhode & Schwartz which claims to >>> cover everything about decibels, but, er, doesn't. >>> >>> CD. >> >> That would be -13 + 20 = +7dBm, provided that impedances are matched >> everywhere. > > I was under the impression that one couldn't simply just add dBs to dBms? You can. That's what decibels were invented for. Let's spell it out then. You know 0 dBm is 1 mW. So -13 dBm is 10^(-13/10) times 1 mW, or 50 uW. A 20dB attenuator divides power by a factor of 10^(20/10), that is, a factor of 100. So before the attenuator, you had 5 mW. 5mW is 10*log(5) is +7 dBm. Jeroen Belleman