Path: Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 02:07:29 +0000 From: BTR1701 Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Meet U.N. "Climate Advisor" Ayisha Siddiqa... References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Usenapp/0.92.2/l for MacOS Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 02:07:29 +0000 Lines: 129 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-byao0EiQu9ML0MV3bdxIXYzIEWR8o7zSvQQxQ57GnOCDdZ+T1aYyPwREV2BcQiGmfs1jkqvJxEsBnT0!FHpe1KvbjJNN89zFbNQ1U4Z3O0EjAaAK8lFmbKDvuISoV4yP0SrQETL9CEOojt4JHDFt88Z98972 X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 7009 X-Original-Lines: 123 On Apr 9, 2024 at 6:13:48 PM PDT, "FPP" wrote: > On 4/9/24 12:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >> On Apr 9, 2024 at 6:48:25 AM PDT, "FPP" wrote: >> >>> On 4/8/24 4:08 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>> In article , FPP >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 4/5/24 3:29 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>> FPP wrote: >>>>>>> On 4/4/24 8:50 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>> In article , FPP >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 4/4/24 3:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In article , FPP >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/24 11:11 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ayisha Siddiqa (@Ayishas12), a climate adviser for the UN. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1775191286032523366?s=20 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> She claims the "white man" and "capitalism" are responsible for >>>>>>>>>>>> bringing life to "the verge of extinction" and calls white men >>>>>>>>>>>> killers, looters, and abusers. Her account is filled with hateful >>>>>>>>>>>> anti-white posts. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Apparently, it's totally fine to be disgustingly racist against >>>>>>>>>>>> white people if you work at the United Nations. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why are we funding these racist clowns with our tax dollars? The >>>>>>>>>>>> United States should simply withdraw from the U.N., send these >>>>>>>>>>>> bigoted assholes back to their shithole countries, and retrofit >>>>>>>>>>>> U.N. Plaza to house our homeless veterans. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Libs of Tik Tok. That's all I need to say. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> LOL! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Because posting other people's self-owns somehow invalidates those >>>>>>>>>> self-owns. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Posting racists and book banners, you mean. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ayisha Siddiqa is a racist, I'll grant you, but what books has she >>>>>>>> banned? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Raichik has left up scores of tweets denying the existence of systemic >>>>>>> racism. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cool. Now answer the question I asked. >>>>>> >>>>>> The day after Juneteenth 2021, Raichikšs account posted a >>>>>>> callout to her followers, asking them to reply with one word and she >>>>>>> would try to find a video saying why that word is racist. >>>>>> >>>>>> So she finds various videos from leftists claiming almost any word you can >>>>>> think of is racist and she's racist for posting them? >>>>>> >>>>>> Oooo-kay, Jan. >>>>> >>>> So now you're a racist if you don't automatically agree with whatever >>>> racism claims leftist make? That's in an interesting take. Insane, but >>>> interesting. >>>> >>> Nope. I forgot you can't read. "She's racist because she holds racist >>> opinions." is a simple concept to grasp, even for you. >> >> What opinion of hers is racist? >> >>>> Slate scrolled through thousands of Raichik's tweets, including hundreds of >>>> deleted tweets, to understand how one real estate agent could gain such >>>> clout and to try to discern her next targets. One notable trend was clear: >>>> Raichik’s feed is colored by an intense hostility to liberals generally, but >>>> she holds an especially pronounced animosity toward LGBTQ people, city >>>> dwellers, and black people who have been killed at the hands of police. >>> >>>> The same week that Raichik said she started "the tik tok thing", Minneapolis >>>> police officer Derek Chauvin was convicted of murdering George Floyd. Prior >>>> to his conviction, Raichik had focused on a different flavor of right-wing >>>> content under other usernames. But around the time the verdict came down, >>>> Raichik let her apparent views on police violence be known: Floyd was a >>>> criminal and his death was the result of drug use, not Chauvin's brutality, >>>> she made clear in a series of tweets. >> >> That's actually true. Saint Floyd's cause of death was a drug overdose. >> >>>> Raichik’s apparent hostility for black victims of police violence didn't end >>>> with Floyd. She also tweeted repeatedly mocking the killing of 16-year-old >>>> Ma'Khia Bryant, and in another video, the account endorsed random police >>>> brutality. >>> >>> So you can go right out and fuck right off. She's a goddamned racist >>> because she holds racist opinions. >>> >>> Just. Like. I. Proved. >> >> You proved nothing other than Slate has called her a racist. They say they >> found racist tweets but then said they were deleted, so we conveniently >> can't >> see all this racism they claim exists. >> >> And then they, like you, claim that just denying the existence of 'systemic >> racism' is itself racist. If that's what Slate (and you) consider racism, >> then >> you're both full of shit. >> >> Oh, and by the way, just as you constantly dismiss things based on the bias >> of >> the messenger, you're going to have to come up with something better than >> Slate if you want to actually prove anything because-- according to Effa's >> Own >> Rules-- Slate is a very biased messenger, which nothing they say is >> trustworthy and you've proved nothing. >> >> > You can see the old tweets just fine, Dumbo. > > > https://www.queerty.com/libs-tiktok-deletes-thousands-tweets-owner-exposed-internet-remembers-forever-20220420 Queerty.com... that's all I need to say. (Hey, this is fun! Just dismiss a source because it's biased and there's no need to go any further. Thanks for this rule, Effa!)