Path: ...!s1-3.netnews.com!news-out.netnews.com!postmaster.netnews.com!us8.netnews.com!not-for-mail X-Trace: DXC=F=\`?7F X-Complaints-To: support@frugalusenet.com Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 00:48:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: The Unprotected Class: How Anti-White Racism is Tearing America Apart Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis,rec.arts.tv,uk.comp.sys.mac,edm.general,sci.electronics.design References: <0001HW.2C03BD0B032D7BBD30E57938F@news.giganews.com> Content-Language: en-US From: bitrex In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 115 Message-ID: <66556205$0$6559$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1 X-Trace: 1716871685 reader.netnews.com 6559 127.0.0.1:42917 Bytes: 7039 On 5/26/2024 5:41 PM, john larkin wrote: > On Sun, 26 May 2024 11:55:07 -0700, Pluted Pup > wrote: > >> On Fri, 24 May 2024 13:29:13 -0700, NefeshBarYochai wrote: >> >>> https://www.amren.com/features/2024/05/the-respectable-right-discovers-anti-white-hostility/ >>> >>> Conclusion >>> >>> As Mr. Carl writes, white Americans today "suffer from downward >>> economic mobility, declining fertility, rising drug addiction and >>> depression, and narrowing opportunities, all piled onto a false >>> presumption of privilege." Any vestigial advantages they may still >>> derive from belonging to America´s historical majority are "informal >>> and evanescent cultural legacies," whereas "the discrimination they >>> experience is . . . increasingly legal and formal." >>> >>> Obviously, if there were any real "white privilege," non-whites would >>> be trying to "pass" for white (as they once did). Instead, we see a >>> flight from white. The reported American Indian population ballooned >>> from 0.4 percent in 1970 to nearly 3 percent in 2020, not due to any >>> explosion in fertility but to an increase in Elizabeth Warren-style >>> claims aimed at getting non-white privilege. >>> >>> Mr. Carl acknowledges that whites are not merely the victims of >>> anti-white hostility, but often its most enthusiastic perpetrators. He >>> combines a defense of whites as a group with harsh criticism of these >>> white progressives, writing that their "moral mania has made them, >>> without question, the most destructive group in American life. No real >>> solution to our racial problems is possible until they either reject >>> their current anti-white animus or are removed from their positions of >>> power and authority." >>> >>> The endgame of the current system is "the expropriation of land, >>> property, and other wealth from whites" and the institution of "a >>> permanent regime of anti-white employment and legal discrimination." >>> As of now, he writes, "appeals to expropriation are usually indirect," >>> but over time they "will become more direct and in need of less >>> justification as the political power of white Americans continues to >>> decline." >>> >>> Two developments make this clear. The first is the growing success of >>> the reparations movement: >>> >>> Black reparations will open the door to massive multi-trillion-dollar >>> payments to any group that can seize the holy grail of victimhood. We >>> aren´t going to win this fight by nibbling around the edges, by >>> compromising, or by saying that groups deserve reparations for this >>> but not for that. We must pull up root and branch the entire concept >>> of mass racial reparations. >>> >>> The alternative is likely to be "racial extortion on an unimaginable >>> scale," possibly leading to "interethnic violence and a collapse of >>> American society." >>> >>> The second recent development is a practice imported from Canada: land >>> acknowledgements. It is no common for institutions built by whites to >>> "acknowledge" that they are on land taken from this or that tribe. As >>> the author points out, the entire practice is intellectually >>> incoherent, since the particular group whose lands whites occupied >>> were seldom or never the first group to hold them. An honest land >>> acknowledgement might sound something like: "Our ancestors took this >>> land from the Chippewa, who had previously driven out the Sioux to >>> another place where they would go on to massacre the Pawnee," etc., >>> etc. More importantly, such "acknowledgements" are "an intellectual >>> precursor to expropriation," and deserve to be taken seriously as >>> such. >>> >>> Mr. Carl reports that some readers of early drafts of The Unprotected >>> Class were enthusiastic about his ideas but felt that "a non-white >>> ought to write such a book instead of him." >>> >>> Somehow a white person advancing arguments that white people should be >>> treated fairly was seen as unseemly. It´s an understandable political >>> instinct for anyone who has been involved in American politics in >>> recent decades, but ultimately it´s an attitude we need to eliminate. >>> >>> It is whites´ failure to organize in defense of our own interests that >>> had made the anti-white regime possible. As Mr. Carl writes, >>> "non-whites have organized and made powerful demands, while whites >>> have focused on broad, gauzy appeals to . . . universal rights" that >>> have proven "almost completely ineffective." It is time for us to make >>> strong demands. >>> >>> As noted, we have looked here at only a few of the twelve realms of >>> anti-white discrimination Mr. Carl discusses. The reader should get >>> the book itself for the full story. I am unaware of any mainstream >>> book on race published since American Renaissance was founded 34 years >>> ago that pulls so few punches. >>> >>> The Unprotected Class: How Anti-White Racism is Tearing America >>> Apart, Regnery Publishing, 2024, 369+xviii pages, >> >> 'doesn't pull punches'? >> >> Where does it cover Jew against White? >> > > One major cause of anti-semitism was that both Christians and Muslims > considered usury, lending money at interest, to be sinful. So people > and kings had to borrow from Jews to finance their farms and > businesses and wars. It was then more convenient to have inquisitions > and pogroms and genocides than it was to pay them back. > OP is posting material from a white supremacist website like AmRen previously, they are dead to me. OP is not anti-war, they are just a Jew-hater. There is no place for Jew-haters in the anti-war movement. there is no place for Jew-haters on the left (though they do sometimes try to put themselves here.) See also: