Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: GUILTY. All 34 counts.
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 12:47:30 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <v3ks34$3v6n2$5@dont-email.me>
References: <v3aqcf$1rrag$1@dont-email.me>
 <17d4868a3e24d1db$190443$2863996$46d50c60@news.newsdemon.com>
 <v3c9p8$26ltd$3@dont-email.me> <hdB6O.6228$xPJ1.647@fx09.iad>
 <v3ht7h$3c99f$10@dont-email.me>
 <17d53ab9426ca12e$9444$2724781$4ad50060@news.newsdemon.com>
 <v3j396$3is5k$7@dont-email.me> <hHe7O.4270$QX6b.2142@fx46.iad>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2024 18:47:32 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f1e7cd7af021c36e38ff91ee439e5b25";
	logging-data="4168418"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/wrYSYPD7mH+xuCih/49cVuv6apIL1LGs="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:94BxNCZgmYCGsrqjK8cHsMB3u94=
In-Reply-To: <hHe7O.4270$QX6b.2142@fx46.iad>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2462

On 6/3/2024 3:57 AM, trotsky wrote:
> On 6/2/24 7:37 PM, FPP wrote:
>> On 6/2/24 11:49 AM, trotsky wrote:
>>> On 6/2/24 8:48 AM, FPP wrote:
>>>> On 6/1/24 4:46 AM, trotsky wrote:
>>>>> On 5/31/24 5:46 AM, FPP wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/31/24 4:48 AM, trotsky wrote:
>>>>>>> On 5/30/24 4:17 PM, FPP wrote:
>>>>>>>> GUILTY. All 34 counts.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I called it.  Let the whining begin!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yup... I was shooting for Friday.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And you said some counts, so there.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I've never been happier about being wrong.
>>>
>>>
>>> I think when the jurors went to deliberate they quickly decided that 
>>> Trump was guilty as fuck and said to each other that it would be a 
>>> waste of time to go through each count and just said fuck it, we'll 
>>> say he's guilty on all counts.  I know I would.
>>>
>>
>> They took enough time so that there weren't grounds to appeal because 
>> they didn't take it seriously enough.
>>
>> Having 2 lawyers on the jury saw to that.
> 
> Is "the just took too little time" really a grounds for appeal?
Per se, maybe not.  But it would seem to support other appeals.