Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Andrew <andrew@spam.net>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android,ca.driving
Subject: Re: It's a myth that cellphone use caused the accident rate to rise in the USA
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 21:15:23 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID: <v385tb$1h3q$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References: <v2ssjo$ddd$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <v2v70b$pkq2$1@solani.org> <v2vfbf$mks$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <xn0oma1306bpbsj000@reader443.eternal-september.org> <v33obj$grl$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <3ce32e95-3359-c3f6-7c34-6909bcb82a5b@invalid.nospam> <v36b7s$1r28$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <630736f2-6537-e202-9116-4c013d56140d@invalid.nospam>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 21:15:23 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com;
	logging-data="50298"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blueworldhosting.com"
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4QfiBLr5YuQUYWbz/A4FS2erhww= sha256:O+SsQwUEgn8ZwvZmJfGTBu62aVO0TSayyrG0//C/lDw=
	sha1:wI9voocK6VgvXsyOiORERAg/i0A= sha256:o88OV7Ptw9UrSHffDC6ks7NvvG+1eK3hXJchT1SsRB4=
X-Newsreader: PiaoHong.Usenet.Client.Free:1.65
Bytes: 2776
Lines: 35

Newyana2 wrote on Wed, 29 May 2024 08:25:07 -0400 :

>    If you want to discuss ANYTHING you have to start by trying
> to be intellectually honest. You can't do that if you hold onto a
> vested interest in the outcome.

I don't care what the "outcome" is, as I don't make any money off of
whether or not the accident rate is a high or low number.

I simply stated a fact.
I provided references which prove that fact.

The fact is simply the accident rate, which has been reported by the US
Census Bureau since around the 1920's, and nobody sensible disputes it.

So far, everyone who responded has merely said they hate the facts.
That's their entire argument.

I've provided the cites to the facts.
They provided nothing.

What's even more absurd, is micky said that facts are merely opinions.

Given that's been the response, you tell me how an intelligent discussion
is possible with those who simply hate that facts are being cited?

What facts do you cite, for example?
Cite them.

I'll read them.

Just don't cite bullshit statistics from the three entities who stand the
most money to gain from their propaganda which turn out to be shills.

If you have reliable facts, then cite them.
If you don't, then why do you disagree with the reliable facts?