Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Adam H. Kerman" Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Coroner's verdict homicide in downhill skiing collision Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 10:39:56 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: Injection-Date: Thu, 09 May 2024 12:39:56 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="43f4f53bcad2d67888b05886291c4d32"; logging-data="638464"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19R+4QeISrrCm9q2lUovKIrNGBPEzpRU6E=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:x+z2Xv8JduYKi6lOR8ued1BZfaU= X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Bytes: 1681 BTR1701 wrote: >Adam H. Kerman wrote: >>At Jackson Hole, a downhill skier collided with a ski instructor. The >>ski instructor was wearing a helmut. He would die. >>The death was ruled a homicide. This is quite unusual. In skiing, the >>burden is on the skier who is uphill to avoid the collision with the >>person below. The coroner must have felt there was time and distance to >>maneuver around and that failure to do so was criminally reckless. >Wouldn't that depend on the skill level of the skier? Yes. If the downhill skier's skills were so very inadequate that he lacked the ability to avoid the collision, then that's criminally recklessness behavior and supports the finding of homicide and not accidental.