Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2024 10:53:30 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Kamala Outright Lies About Women's Basketball Brackets Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv References: <17d4370a814a9fe0$40$3919488$c2d58868@news.newsdemon.com> <17d484d04f3ee493$668$273357$d54a64@news.newsdemon.com> <_aB6O.6227$xPJ1.5613@fx09.iad> <17d4f219526ef751$751$273357$d54a64@news.newsdemon.com> Content-Language: en-US From: trotsky In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 78 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2024 15:53:30 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 3975 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17d53aea33ae87ec$9480$2724781$4ad50060@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 4355 On 6/2/24 8:25 AM, FPP wrote: > On 6/1/24 1:39 PM, trotsky wrote: >> On 6/1/24 11:26 AM, moviePig wrote: >>> On 6/1/2024 4:43 AM, trotsky wrote: >>>> On 5/31/24 5:34 AM, FPP wrote: >>>>> On 5/31/24 4:16 AM, trotsky wrote: >>>>>> On 5/30/24 9:53 AM, FPP wrote: >>>>>>> On 5/30/24 4:31 AM, trotsky wrote: >>>>>>>> On 5/29/24 3:19 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>> Kamala Harris claimed that women's basketball wasn't even >>>>>>>>> allowed to have >>>>>>>>> playoff brackets until 2022, when in reality, women's >>>>>>>>> basketball has been >>>>>>>>> using them since 1982, 42 years. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Kamala herself tweeted out exchanges with her husband in 2021 >>>>>>>>> where they >>>>>>>>> talked about who they were choosing in their brackets. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/yYjH5g9ogXE?t=409 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Between Biden's almost weekly made-up stories about his past >>>>>>>>> and Kamala >>>>>>>>> gaslighting us about women's basketball, what the hell is going >>>>>>>>> on in the >>>>>>>>> White House? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What the hell is going on with Trump's impending conviction? >>>>>>>> Oh, and besides Trump who do you think makes the GOP look worse, >>>>>>>> Santos or McCarthy? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Harris owned up to the mistake, and explained it... but you won't >>>>>>> hear that in Thanny's False Equivalency Gazette. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm not a fan of hers but she is upstanding in that way.  The GOP >>>>>> isn't upstanding in any way.  My biggest regret is that Trump >>>>>> likely won't be sentenced to jail time. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Don't be too sure.  He's shown no remorse, and he did violate gag >>>>> orders 10 or 11 times.  Those are big mitigating circumstances. >>>>> >>>>> I could see him serving weekends as a punishment.  And even >>>>> community service, which would absolutely humiliate him to death. >>>>> >>>>> Fact is, he's going to get some form of punishment. >>>> >>>> >>>> Judge Merchan is very cool.  It's hard to read how he'll react on >>>> this one.  Your points are well taken though, he should be sentence >>>> accordingly for those reasons.  I'm thinking he'll get sentenced to >>>> home confinement with an ankle bracelet. >>> >>> The choice of punishment could reasonably consider a convict's >>> likelihood to re-offend.  Since Trump's conviction was ultimately >>> about election interference, the judge might notice that Trump >>> currently stands accused of at least two other instances of exactly >>> that. >> >> >> Is that your supposition or have you heard that somewhere else? >> > > It's all part of the calculation.  Trump is pushing his luck, and if he > gets time, it'll all be because he's been asking for it. > > I could see him doing weekends in jail.  That wouldn't hurt his > campaigning, and would teach him to shut his yap. To be fair anybody else in the world who acted as flagrantly as Trump would be hung out to dry--why should the fat orange weasel get any preferential treatment?