Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Adam H. Kerman" Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Selected programming for June 8-14, 2024 Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 19:01:33 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 28 Message-ID: References: <1237479378.739646423.627110.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com> Injection-Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2024 21:01:33 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8adda3cbd5f6742c7585abb440e8ee77"; logging-data="3907512"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18S0dBATkvVrlSwXICCE62ZGlj7Sow1Dek=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:Kx3zBLpIA15bPwcijc5JqEkEgAE= X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Bytes: 2121 Ian J. Ball wrote: >On 6/9/24 10:22 AM, anim8rfsk wrote: >>Ian J. Ball wrote: >>>On 6/9/24 6:39 AM, Arthur Lipscomb wrote: >>>>Most of my streaming service plans are either annual so I pay once and >>>>forget about it or free through cable. >>>My Peacock and Prime are annual - I will renew Peacock annual soon, but >>>I have to decide what to do about Prime since they changed my plan on me >>>halfway through. >>>Max and Pee+ I get ("free") through my cable. And I don't have Netflix >>>right now, and have no real incentive to get it, even during summer... >>I got an email yesterday from the Amazon trying to get me to buy a new fire >>stick for 20 bucks which would include six months free MGM plus. >>Unfortunately, GM plus is worthless. If they were to give me six months >>max, I might do it and just toss the thing. >Yeah, I wouldn't care about MGM+. But if I could get Starz for 6 months >free, I would surely be interested in that... Hey! From! I like MGM+, at least the satellite and On Demand versions. Starz has long been overpriced crap. That's why nobody gets it.