Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mikko Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:00:12 +0300 Organization: - Lines: 48 Message-ID: References: <8c92495d4433776d8ddc4706fb1de05b245f5829.camel@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 09:00:13 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e311fff3086b626806b3f1f2b05f967c"; logging-data="273877"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18M3xOhwThfLDRA01DSrZEY" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:YP9ZY5xtXKrDwQTBeia/kEAwVE4= Bytes: 3454 On 2024-06-09 16:18:58 +0000, olcott said: > On 6/9/2024 10:32 AM, Mikko wrote: >> On 2024-06-09 12:51:40 +0000, olcott said: >> >>> On 6/9/2024 2:34 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>> On 2024-06-08 13:07:11 +0000, olcott said: >>>> >>>>> On 6/8/2024 2:01 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>>>> On 2024-06-07 22:22:19 +0000, olcott said: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6/7/2024 3:45 PM, joes wrote: >>>>>>>> Am Fri, 07 Jun 2024 21:22:12 +0200 schrieb immibis: >>>>>>>>> He only ignores people now. Except Richard for some reason. >>>>>>>> The reason being that Richard responds at the same level >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You respond with persistent false assumptions that cannot be >>>>>>> corrected by feedback. >>>>>> >>>>>> You cannot correct other people's false assumtion but >>>>>> you can always present your own for comparison. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I can correct other people false assumptions iff (if and only if) >>>>> they are as interested in an honest dialogue as I am. >>>> >>>> Not even then. If one does not correct one's assumption oneself they >>>> remain uncorrected. >>> >>> So one majickly cures one's own ignorance? >> >> Rarely that way. >> >>> If one assumes 5 > 6 then one is wrong. >> >> Your disagreement does not prevent one from keeping that assumption. >> > > The verified facts prevent anyone from correctly > maintaining false assumptions. No, they don't, if one assumes that the verification was incorrect. Besides, you didn't say they maintain their false assumtions "correctly". -- Mikko